From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.pbcl.net ([88.198.119.4] helo=hetzner.pbcl.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TGsnW-00036A-9H for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 16:41:10 +0200 Received: from elite.brightsigndigital.co.uk ([81.142.160.137] helo=[172.30.1.145]) by hetzner.pbcl.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TGsb7-0006Tz-KX; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 16:28:21 +0200 From: Phil Blundell To: Colin Walters Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 15:28:20 +0100 In-Reply-To: <1348668853.7240.5.camel@lenny> References: <1348661842.31293.108.camel@phil-desktop> <1348668794.7240.4.camel@lenny> <1348668853.7240.5.camel@lenny> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.0.2- Message-ID: <1348669701.31293.116.camel@phil-desktop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: openembedded-core Subject: Re: [PATCH] glib-2.0: Update to 2.34.0 X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 14:41:10 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 2012-09-26 at 10:14 -0400, Colin Walters wrote: > On Wed, 2012-09-26 at 10:13 -0400, Colin Walters wrote: > > On Wed, 2012-09-26 at 13:17 +0100, Phil Blundell wrote: > > > > > meta/recipes-core/glib-2.0/glib-2.0/nodbus.patch | 34 ++++++++-------- > > > > This should not be necessary anymore; see: > > http://git.gnome.org/browse/glib/commit/?id=f084b603771f78126bc0b07229a1574b76e776bb That disables all the tests, right? I wasn't entirely clear whether we wanted to do that or not. If we do then yes, I agree, that would be a way to avoid the nodbus.patch. p.