From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 93-97-173-237.zone5.bethere.co.uk ([93.97.173.237] helo=tim.rpsys.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TJ0VQ-000868-Cc for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 02 Oct 2012 13:19:16 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q92B6FtQ015011; Tue, 2 Oct 2012 12:06:15 +0100 Received: from tim.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tim.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 14190-05; Tue, 2 Oct 2012 12:06:11 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.3.10] ([192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q92B68gl015005 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 2 Oct 2012 12:06:08 +0100 Message-ID: <1349175971.15753.137.camel@ted> From: Richard Purdie To: "Burton, Ross" Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2012 12:06:11 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: <1349092569-26895-1-git-send-email-ross.burton@intel.com> <20121001120203.GC3454@jama.jama.net> <1349175360.15753.134.camel@ted> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.3-0ubuntu6 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rpsys.net Cc: Martin Jansa , openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] libdrm: Remove Cairo dependency X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2012 11:19:16 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tue, 2012-10-02 at 11:58 +0100, Burton, Ross wrote: > On 2 October 2012 11:56, Richard Purdie > wrote: > > Shouldn't we just disable the things to gain a small bit of build speed > > if they don't matter? :) > > That means carrying a patch and the maintenance burden when upgrading. > I'm not entirely sure you'll notice all ten lines of Cairo code being > compiled if cairo happens to be installed when libdrm2 builds. I don't feel strongly about it but it sounds like the kind of thing it would be useful to switch off and upstream would probably take such a patch? Cheers, Richard