From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 93-97-173-237.zone5.bethere.co.uk ([93.97.173.237] helo=tim.rpsys.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TJlDB-0003pO-IH for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 04 Oct 2012 15:11:37 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q94CwKL1006840; Thu, 4 Oct 2012 13:58:20 +0100 Received: from tim.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tim.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 05653-08; Thu, 4 Oct 2012 13:58:15 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.3.10] ([192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q94CwCsP006834 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 4 Oct 2012 13:58:13 +0100 Message-ID: <1349355495.18301.93.camel@ted> From: Richard Purdie To: "Maupin, Chase" Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2012 13:58:15 +0100 In-Reply-To: <7D46E86EC0A8354091174257B2FED10159242C29@DLEE12.ent.ti.com> References: <1349213439-14199-1-git-send-email-Chase.Maupin@ti.com> <1349342479.18301.68.camel@ted> <7D46E86EC0A8354091174257B2FED10159242C29@DLEE12.ent.ti.com> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.3-0ubuntu6 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rpsys.net Cc: "openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH] libtool: Add missing DEPENDS on libtool-cross X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2012 13:11:38 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Thu, 2012-10-04 at 12:39 +0000, Maupin, Chase wrote: > I was able to reproduce this consistently on my build server which has > 24 cores running at 3.5 GHz. I was using: > > BB_NUMBER_THREADS = "24" > > And > > PARALLEL_MAKE = "-j 24" > > I can try a build reducing the number of threads and see if the issue > goes away as this might be a difference between our builds. Can you > tell me what you are using? I tested this with 48/48 in master. > It seemed like a race condition because after I got the error I was > able to do a -c cleanall of libtool and kick off the build again once > libtool-cross was built and it would pass. Likewise I did: > > bitbake libtool-cross > bitbake libtool > > and that would work but just > > bitbake libtool > > would fail. "bitbake libtool" works here quite consistently. I therefore don't want to add this dependency until we figure out exactly what is racing against what or have a better understanding of why this is failing. Something doesn't seem right as if your premise of a missing dependency is correct, the above wouldn't work. Cheers, Richard