From: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Daniel Stone <daniel@fooishbar.org>
Cc: openembedded-core <openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] libdrm: Explicitly disable the cairo dependency
Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2012 09:01:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1349683286.15658.91.camel@ted> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPj87rM0BH_eU+6j66Gq7+mrPs2JbrwDZdu58gqwJ_34vNeKmg@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, 2012-10-08 at 16:44 +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On 7 October 2012 12:10, Daniel Stone <daniel@fooishbar.org> wrote:
> > On 5 October 2012 21:47, Richard Purdie
> > <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >> We don't want the cairo dependency. Unfortunately simply checking whether its present
> >> isn't good enough. If its not in DEPENDS, it can disappear half way through building.
> >> We therefore need to explicitly disable it.
> >
> > I've done roughly the same thing in this commit:
> > http://cgit.collabora.com/git/user/daniels/poky.git/commit/?id=96a6e8e9eb7c086be3fcbde6a38ac3b699fca008
> >
> > which has already been submitted upstream:
> > http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2012-October/028514.html
Thanks for that, sending something upstream was on my todo list but I
needed to fix the breaking builds more urgently.
> My patch also has the advantage of not trying to link against Cairo if
> it's present but disabled. Without this, if you build libdrm, build
> Cairo, clean libdrm and attempt to rebuild it again, the rebuild will
> fail, because the test still attempts to link with -lcairo, which
> fails as Cairo's .la file references libdrm.
I'm assuming you mean libdrm's .la file references cario?
Since I pass in --disable-cairo, it never runs the pkgconfig test for
cairo and never puts the include/library options into play. I did test
that and just retested and it doesn't reference it.
Cheers,
Richard
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-08 8:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-05 11:47 [PATCH] libdrm: Explicitly disable the cairo dependency Richard Purdie
2012-10-05 11:54 ` Phil Blundell
2012-10-05 13:22 ` Richard Purdie
2012-10-05 13:03 ` Otavio Salvador
2012-10-07 1:10 ` Daniel Stone
2012-10-08 5:44 ` Daniel Stone
2012-10-08 8:01 ` Richard Purdie [this message]
2012-10-08 8:32 ` Daniel Stone
2012-10-08 9:19 ` Richard Purdie
2012-10-08 9:22 ` [PATCH 1/3] Revert "libdrm: Explicitly disable the cairo dependency" Daniel Stone
2012-10-08 9:22 ` [PATCH 2/3] DRM: Bump git recipe to latest 2.4.39+ revision Daniel Stone
2012-10-08 9:22 ` [PATCH 3/3] DRM: Add --disable-cairo-tests switch Daniel Stone
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1349683286.15658.91.camel@ted \
--to=richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=daniel@fooishbar.org \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox