From: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Martin Jansa <martin.jansa@gmail.com>
Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sstate: add manifest info for shared file matches
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2012 12:07:05 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1350644825.2520.19.camel@ted> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121019105559.GJ3087@jama.jama.net>
On Fri, 2012-10-19 at 12:55 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 12:25:05PM -0700, Saul Wold wrote:
> > Present the manifest file that contains the matches for
> > files being installed to a location that already contains
> > that file. This will help to determine which is the correct
> > recipe to fix when this occurs.
> >
> > [YOCTO #3191]
>
> Can we do the same when removing files from sysroot?
>
> To catch errors like this:
> http://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core/commit/?id=6b12d4cd39bacb087654b59e25f5052a4e839b26
>
> 12:40:15 < JaMa> it depends on order of tasks
> 12:41:27 < JaMa> gettext-native depends on gettext-minimal-native, so gettext-minimal-native installs own config.rpath to sysroot (when gettext-native "owns"
> it too)
> 12:41:55 < JaMa> then gettext-native is built and before populting sysroot it removes own files there (including config.rpath)
> 12:43:45 < JaMa> and because sstate assumes that every file in sysroot is provided by exactly one recipe, gettext-minimal-native looses his config.rpath
> 12:44:49 < JaMa> now there is at least warning when 2 recipes are installing the same file to sysroot, but that doesn't resolve this issues when some file is
> "moved" between recipes
> 12:47:30 < JaMa> because gettext-minimal-native is only recipe installing it
> 12:47:39 < JaMa> and gettext-native is only removing it
>
> If we check manifests from other recipes before removing files we can show warning that
> gettext-native is trying to remove config.rpath now provided by gettext-minimal-native
> and keep config.rpath in sysroot.
The plan is to make it a hard error if something installs a file that
already exists. This issue will be resolved when that happens and I want
to get there sooner than later.
Running the check at sysroot clean time is therefore going to complicate
the code a lot and damage performance with no real end need...
> Now everybody doing incremental builds needs to call
> bitbake -c cleansstate gettext-minimal-native
-c clean should be sufficient. I wish people would use appropriately
sized hammers and this is why I never wanted cleansstate in the first
place :(.
Cheers,
Richard
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-19 11:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-18 19:25 [PATCH] sstate: add manifest info for shared file matches Saul Wold
2012-10-19 10:55 ` Martin Jansa
2012-10-19 11:07 ` Richard Purdie [this message]
2012-10-19 11:29 ` Martin Jansa
2012-10-19 14:41 ` Chris Larson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1350644825.2520.19.camel@ted \
--to=richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=martin.jansa@gmail.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox