From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.pbcl.net ([88.198.119.4] helo=hetzner.pbcl.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TQKL3-00045m-65 for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 22 Oct 2012 17:54:49 +0200 Received: from elite.brightsigndigital.co.uk ([81.142.160.137] helo=[172.30.1.145]) by hetzner.pbcl.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TQK86-0000r7-Eh for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 22 Oct 2012 17:41:26 +0200 From: Phil Blundell To: oe-core Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2012 16:41:25 +0100 X-Mailer: Evolution 3.0.2- Message-ID: <1350920486.3259.330.camel@phil-desktop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Why does glib-2.0 DEPEND on zip? X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2012 15:54:49 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit It seems that glib-2.0 has had a dependency on zip for as far back as I could be bothered to trace the history. However, I couldn't immediately see any reason why this should be the case. Does anyone know where this came from and what purpose it serves? thanks p.