From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 93-97-173-237.zone5.bethere.co.uk ([93.97.173.237] helo=tim.rpsys.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TQeRR-0007xJ-La for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 23 Oct 2012 15:22:45 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q9ND9Ix0016824; Tue, 23 Oct 2012 14:09:18 +0100 Received: from tim.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tim.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 15752-07; Tue, 23 Oct 2012 14:09:13 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.3.10] ([192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q9ND9Bva016818 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 23 Oct 2012 14:09:12 +0100 Message-ID: <1350997751.22340.52.camel@ted> From: Richard Purdie To: Andreas =?ISO-8859-1?Q?M=FCller?= Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2012 14:09:11 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: <1350975871-26719-1-git-send-email-schnitzeltony@googlemail.com> <1350975871-26719-2-git-send-email-schnitzeltony@googlemail.com> <1350991343.22340.43.camel@ted> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.3-0ubuntu6 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rpsys.net X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by tim.rpsys.net id q9ND9Ix0016824 Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] gnome-icon-theme: fix icon mapping X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2012 13:22:45 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 2012-10-23 at 14:38 +0200, Andreas M=C3=BCller wrote: > On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 1:22 PM, Richard Purdie > wrote: > > Doesn't this need a DEPENDS +=3D "libxml-simple-perl-native" or whate= ver > > the correct name for the module is? >=20 > Sounds reasonable. Subsequent patch or V3? V3 please, might as well get this right and sorry I didn't realise this before. Cheers, Richard