From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 93-97-173-237.zone5.bethere.co.uk ([93.97.173.237] helo=tim.rpsys.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TSmZU-0000Kx-Aj for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 29 Oct 2012 11:27:52 +0100 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q9TAEG0L002813; Mon, 29 Oct 2012 10:14:16 GMT Received: from tim.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tim.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 22738-04; Mon, 29 Oct 2012 10:14:12 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [192.168.3.10] ([192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q9TAE8Ee002805 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 29 Oct 2012 10:14:09 GMT Message-ID: <1351505648.2828.2.camel@ted> From: Richard Purdie To: Giuseppe Condorelli Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 10:14:08 +0000 In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.3-0ubuntu6 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rpsys.net Cc: oe-core layer , Patches Subject: Re: uclibc sdk issue X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 10:27:52 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Mon, 2012-10-29 at 09:48 +0100, Giuseppe Condorelli wrote: > Hi Khem, > > what I want to build is the meta-toolchain (uclibc) and looking at the > build I can see system tries to build also eglibc packages. > Maybe I'm wrong in something. > Welcome advice. So that the toolchain can be used on many different systems the toolchain binaries themselves link against their own libc which ships as part of meta-toolchain. We use eglibc for this and uclibc is not supported. The target libc that ships with the toolchain can be uclibc though, that is perfectly fine. Build it and have a look at the result as I think it will be fine. Cheers, Richard