From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 93-97-173-237.zone5.bethere.co.uk ([93.97.173.237] helo=tim.rpsys.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TbzPO-00018y-Nu; Fri, 23 Nov 2012 20:59:30 +0100 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id qANJjKX8006703; Fri, 23 Nov 2012 19:45:20 GMT Received: from tim.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tim.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 04388-08; Fri, 23 Nov 2012 19:45:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [192.168.3.10] ([192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id qANJjAgX006659 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 23 Nov 2012 19:45:12 GMT Message-ID: <1353699909.7352.2.camel@ted> From: Richard Purdie To: Otavio Salvador Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2012 19:45:09 +0000 In-Reply-To: References: <1353691611.1361.28.camel@ted> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.3-0ubuntu6 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rpsys.net Cc: bitbake-devel , Constantin Musca , openembedded-core Subject: Re: RFC: Versioning of git recipes (and incremental PR) X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2012 19:59:31 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Fri, 2012-11-23 at 17:23 -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote: > I like to idea of a single updating place. What I dislike is AUTOINC > not being taken care in the fetcher. > > In this case any GIT revision changes, the AUTOINC won't bump as usual > (without PR server)? Why do you need AUTOINC to bump? The only reason we have increments in the fetcher is for package upgrading... Cheers, Richard