From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 93-97-173-237.zone5.bethere.co.uk ([93.97.173.237] helo=tim.rpsys.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TdMmu-0002g7-LA for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 27 Nov 2012 16:09:28 +0100 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id qAREt92J004297; Tue, 27 Nov 2012 14:55:09 GMT Received: from tim.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tim.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 03657-05; Tue, 27 Nov 2012 14:55:04 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [192.168.3.10] ([192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id qAREt02s004277 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 27 Nov 2012 14:55:02 GMT Message-ID: <1354028099.21863.100.camel@ted> From: Richard Purdie To: "Robert P. J. Day" Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2012 14:54:59 +0000 In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.3-0ubuntu6 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rpsys.net Cc: OE Core mailing list Subject: Re: qemuarm: configure of bison fails, claims to need flex [SOLVED?] X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2012 15:09:28 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tue, 2012-11-27 at 05:19 -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > On Tue, 27 Nov 2012, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > > > > trying to build absolutely stock qemuarm image with current oe-core, > > got: > > > > ERROR: Task 800 > > (virtual:native:/home/rpjday/OE/dist/layers/oe-core/meta/recipes-devtools/bison/bison_2.5.1.bb, > > do_configure) failed with exit code '1' > > > > and the log file claimed that bison needed flex. i'm doing it all > > over again from scratch just to make sure it wasn't something silly > > i did, i'll report back if i can reproduce it. > > ah, i see where i did something unapproved -- to test what i could > add to the ASSUME_PROVIDED list, i added this to my local.conf: > > ASSUME_PROVIDED += "m4 quilt" > > which caused the configure step for bison to fail, claiming that it > needed flex. should i have expected that? am i misunderstanding the > rationale for ASSUME_PROVIDED? You are misunderstanding the syntax. Were you not meaning m4-native and quilt-native? Cheers, Richard