From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 93-97-173-237.zone5.bethere.co.uk ([93.97.173.237] helo=tim.rpsys.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TdcVp-0001JD-5V for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 28 Nov 2012 08:56:53 +0100 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id qAS7gZRm011104; Wed, 28 Nov 2012 07:42:35 GMT Received: from tim.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tim.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 09001-10; Wed, 28 Nov 2012 07:42:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [192.168.3.10] ([192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id qAS7gOVF011097 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 28 Nov 2012 07:42:26 GMT Message-ID: <1354088544.21863.134.camel@ted> From: Richard Purdie To: jackie.huang@windriver.com Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 07:42:24 +0000 In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.3-0ubuntu6 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rpsys.net Cc: saul.wold@intel.com, openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] eglibc: move the fix code for optimization isssue to .inc X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 07:56:53 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 2012-11-28 at 14:11 +0800, jackie.huang@windriver.com wrote: > From: Jackie Huang > > I made a patch against the eglibc_2.16.bb for the optimization issue two weeks ago, > but it's not a version specific issue and we still keep the versions 2.13 and 2.15 > (and not having the 2.16 yet), so it would be more appropriate to move the code to > the .inc file. > And we also want to cherry-pick this commit to our oe-core branch so I revert the > previous one and make a new commit against the .inc file but I'm not sure if it is > proper to do that. Please correct me if it is not, thanks! > > * Test info: > 1) MACHINE=qemux86-64/qemuppc/qemumips > $ bitbake core-image-sato > $ bitbake eglibc > > 2) MACHINE=qemux86-64/qemuppc/qemumips > DEBUG_OPTIMIZATION = "-O0 -fno-omit-frame-pointer ${DEBUG_FLAGS} -pipe" > DEBUG_BUILD = "1" or SELECTED_OPTIMIZATION = "${DEBUG_OPTIMIZATION}" > $ bitbake core-image-sato > $ bitbake eglibc > > The following changes since commit 764cc1eb3043c84121f597d2271108b91052095e: > > bitbake.conf: Change build output message to list BUILD_SYS, TARGET_SYS and NATIVELSBSTRING (2012-11-27 08:57:39 +0000) > > are available in the git repository at: > git://git.pokylinux.org/poky-contrib jhuang0/d_eglibc_1128_1 > http://git.pokylinux.org/cgit.cgi/poky-contrib/log/?h=jhuang0/d_eglibc_1128_1 > > Jackie Huang (2): > Revert "eglibc: always compile with optimization." > eglibc: always compile with optimization. I've queued this on master-next. I changed it from two commits to one commit which just moves the code for the reason you describe. Cheers, Richard