From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-ia0-f175.google.com ([209.85.210.175]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TdnBm-0001Lh-43 for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 28 Nov 2012 20:20:54 +0100 Received: by mail-ia0-f175.google.com with SMTP id z3so9764086iad.6 for ; Wed, 28 Nov 2012 11:06:39 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=9UWZOoRstDh+fI+gy9/J4AxhJL138WobNnKizhNThww=; b=M9w+zidPbwwOFuchgDHgZ1SS+cyfhheNzvCRRAzxQEvEcM9Q55QYfxvfjO080jDEVt icNdUNM7rrBQ6quD2gCaG4EXsnHoAyUzhizKXIJAp7ieYl/OHenhbkKaiuOyFrkDOfq+ naL68WOeHhhuTm9vAqivdo04aZboZwIgy+zp12dcjV4UmLBDQ4r/XzHF0vOr6vpyhWmo YzUuyFQQvVAULyU4HG1pneHG5NxUSXumKGW+iDRFAvXDUosHC+U/ew9JyWXiDaP4WnJo va89c6apeSnpzOUQjYbeeni2AenJ8hpoXviQRUzfJityTlihX7keIkGmSkWgz8xWauZi 2d3w== Received: by 10.43.105.129 with SMTP id dq1mr18040812icc.31.1354129598887; Wed, 28 Nov 2012 11:06:38 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.64.19.8 with HTTP; Wed, 28 Nov 2012 11:06:08 -0800 (PST) From: Khem Raj Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 11:06:08 -0800 Message-ID: To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Subject: build logs of all images in or-core X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 19:20:54 -0000 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec5171befb8b63b04cf92ddec --bcaec5171befb8b63b04cf92ddec Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hi All, On an idle machine. I ran all possible image builds for supported qemu arches in OE-Core. Not all the images built successfully. I have posted the logs here http://sakrah.dontexist.org/files/oe-core/ if anyone wants to take a look -Khem --bcaec5171befb8b63b04cf92ddec Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi All,

On an idle machine. I ran all possible image builds
for s= upported qemu arches in OE-Core. Not all the images built successfully. I h= ave posted the logs
here

http://sakrah.dontexist.org/files/oe-core/

if anyone wants to take a look

-Khem
--bcaec5171befb8b63b04cf92ddec-- From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mga11.intel.com ([192.55.52.93]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TdnU7-0001az-1k for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 28 Nov 2012 20:39:51 +0100 Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by fmsmga102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 28 Nov 2012 11:25:35 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,180,1355126400"; d="scan'208";a="256117138" Received: from unknown (HELO swold-linux.bigsur.com) ([10.255.13.127]) by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 28 Nov 2012 11:25:34 -0800 Message-ID: <50B6652E.8060306@linux.intel.com> Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 11:25:34 -0800 From: Saul Wold User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Khem Raj References: In-Reply-To: Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Subject: Re: build logs of all images in or-core X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 19:39:51 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 11/28/2012 11:06 AM, Khem Raj wrote: > Hi All, > > On an idle machine. I ran all possible image builds > for supported qemu arches in OE-Core. Not all the images built > successfully. I have posted the logs > here > Thanks for doing that, I guess it's a little different than the Autobuilder, so most images should build. Can you give us a clue about what did not build? Thanks Sau! > http://sakrah.dontexist.org/files/oe-core/ > > if anyone wants to take a look > > -Khem > > > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-core mailing list > Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core > From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 93-97-173-237.zone5.bethere.co.uk ([93.97.173.237] helo=tim.rpsys.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TdnVP-0001h6-Ph for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 28 Nov 2012 20:41:12 +0100 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id qASJQukA016937; Wed, 28 Nov 2012 19:26:56 GMT Received: from tim.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tim.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 16549-07-2; Wed, 28 Nov 2012 19:26:48 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [192.168.3.10] ([192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id qASJQWRO016879 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 28 Nov 2012 19:26:34 GMT Message-ID: <1354130791.15992.4.camel@ted> From: Richard Purdie To: Khem Raj Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 19:26:31 +0000 In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.3-0ubuntu6 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rpsys.net Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Subject: Re: build logs of all images in or-core X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 19:41:12 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 2012-11-28 at 11:06 -0800, Khem Raj wrote: > Hi All, > > On an idle machine. I ran all possible image builds > for supported qemu arches in OE-Core. Not all the images built > successfully. I have posted the logs > here > > http://sakrah.dontexist.org/files/oe-core/ > > if anyone wants to take a look Could you split them into two directories, successes and failures? I'm interested in one set and not the other ;-) Cheers, Richard From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-ie0-f175.google.com ([209.85.223.175]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Tdnm5-0002cW-JH for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 28 Nov 2012 20:58:29 +0100 Received: by mail-ie0-f175.google.com with SMTP id qd14so14718112ieb.6 for ; Wed, 28 Nov 2012 11:44:10 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=mNKTOY0u+7E2AXAkU0Gf+DKSUqqoHxX90IZCwufYK/Q=; b=tNZD4+PFyHxNjEO6qCilR7e0GyUCXoOPh/oM4ZfI+lW9AUWFggitL+CuXzWjfV2pcZ UGLcGg0YUnJSZJLrjRb8IhI/54EMvWGKTlv336AO2tIuD7KSjNmW56hIjXQtOsw85Kjw zSyZrqtHoZApw2GPfSHDPgS4Qkb2113v0c9Qb5yk1Wq1jJHbJm31XXAntqThGLd9uXSD U/MuJTTXtgpPfVlzPCMRSrtD7ReCNtEXLidjFnC2iaWbTR+vJ/pF1OSAdjAs65kXWerI +xmzzdOSjLHLVZMBQjrkCLeLwqXhaLK5a2m3J0XPCLWCkaWtEKs9HzX78YW+3uao5cXU mQ5A== Received: by 10.50.202.3 with SMTP id ke3mr22708488igc.49.1354131850308; Wed, 28 Nov 2012 11:44:10 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.64.19.8 with HTTP; Wed, 28 Nov 2012 11:43:40 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <50B6652E.8060306@linux.intel.com> References: <50B6652E.8060306@linux.intel.com> From: Khem Raj Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 11:43:40 -0800 Message-ID: To: Saul Wold Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Subject: Re: build logs of all images in or-core X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 19:58:29 -0000 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d0447882deaacd304cf93635f --f46d0447882deaacd304cf93635f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 11:25 AM, Saul Wold wrote: > On 11/28/2012 11:06 AM, Khem Raj wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >> On an idle machine. I ran all possible image builds >> for supported qemu arches in OE-Core. Not all the images built >> successfully. I have posted the logs >> here >> >> > Thanks for doing that, I guess it's a little different than the > Autobuilder, so most images should build. > > yes I am using just oe-core standalone. no more layers > Can you give us a clue about what did not build? > > I have pruned the logs and moved the failed build logs to http://sakrah.dontexist.org/files/oe-core/failed/ > Thanks > > Sau! > > http://sakrah.dontexist.org/**files/oe-core/ >> >> if anyone wants to take a look >> >> -Khem >> >> >> ______________________________**_________________ >> Openembedded-core mailing list >> Openembedded-core@lists.**openembedded.org >> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/**cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/**openembedded-core >> >> --f46d0447882deaacd304cf93635f Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 11:= 25 AM, Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com> wrote:
On 11/28/2012 11:06 AM, Khem Raj wrote:<= br>
Hi All,

On an idle machine. I ran all possible image builds
for supported qemu arches in OE-Core. Not all the images built
successfully. I have posted the logs
here


Thanks for doing that, I guess it's a little different than the Autobui= lder, so most images should build.


yes I am using just oe-core standalone= . no more layers

=C2=A0
Can you give us a clue about what did not build?


I have pruned the logs and moved the f= ailed build logs to

=C2=A0
Thanks

=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Sau!

ht= tp://sakrah.dontexist.org/files/oe-core/

if anyone wants to take a look

-Khem


_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/= listinfo/openembedded-core


--f46d0447882deaacd304cf93635f-- From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 93-97-173-237.zone5.bethere.co.uk ([93.97.173.237] helo=tim.rpsys.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Te1cW-0004ry-1B for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 29 Nov 2012 11:45:28 +0100 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id qATAUvdp023261; Thu, 29 Nov 2012 10:30:57 GMT Received: from tim.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tim.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 21537-07-3; Thu, 29 Nov 2012 10:30:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [192.168.3.10] ([192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id qATATGPX023155 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 29 Nov 2012 10:30:04 GMT Message-ID: <1354178102.4840.2.camel@ted> From: Richard Purdie To: Khem Raj In-Reply-To: References: <50B6652E.8060306@linux.intel.com> Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 08:35:02 +0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.3-0ubuntu6 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rpsys.net Cc: oe-core layer , Patches Subject: Re: build logs of all images in or-core X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 10:45:28 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I had a look through these and we can group them as follows: Unsupported configuration and sensible error given to user: [x11 instead of directfb enabled] eglibc.qemuarm.core-image-gtk-directfb.log eglibc.qemumips.core-image-gtk-directfb.log eglibc.qemuppc.core-image-gtk-directfb.log eglibc.qemux86-64.core-image-gtk-directfb.log eglibc.qemux86.core-image-gtk-directfb.log [live image doesn't work on architecture] eglibc.qemuarm.core-image-minimal-initramfs.log eglibc.qemumips.core-image-minimal-initramfs.log eglibc.qemuppc.core-image-minimal-initramfs.log [Built ok but was misconfigured (two kernels)] eglibc.qemuarm.core-image-rt-sdk.log eglibc.qemuarm.core-image-rt.log eglibc.qemux86-64.core-image-rt-sdk.log eglibc.qemux86-64.core-image-rt.log eglibc.qemux86.core-image-rt-sdk.log eglibc.qemux86.core-image-rt.log [No linux-yocto-rt] eglibc.qemumips.core-image-rt-sdk.log eglibc.qemumips.core-image-rt.log eglibc.qemuppc.core-image-rt-sdk.log eglibc.qemuppc.core-image-rt.log In the above list, I would say that the two kernels being built is a bug we should really fix, the only way to fix it is to make the bitbake warning about multiple providers an error. The "interesting" build failures: [download issue, enable to fetch sources] eglibc.qemuarm.core-image-lsb-sdk.log [weird license build failures] eglibc.qemuarm.core-image-minimal.log eglibc.qemumips.core-image-minimal-dev.log eglibc.qemumips.core-image-sato-dev.log eglibc.qemuppc.core-image-lsb-dev.log eglibc.qemuppc.core-image-minimal-dev.log eglibc.qemuppc.core-image-minimal.log eglibc.qemux86-64.core-image-basic.log eglibc.qemux86-64.core-image-minimal-dev.log eglibc.qemux86.core-image-basic.log eglibc.qemux86.core-image-minimal-dev.log eglibc.qemux86.core-image-x11.log Of which this weird license issue is definitely the biggest problem and the one we need to figure out. The download issue looks to be transient. Cheers, Richard