From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mga14.intel.com ([143.182.124.37]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Te5DW-0001gM-QM for Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 29 Nov 2012 15:35:55 +0100 Received: from azsmga002.ch.intel.com ([10.2.17.35]) by azsmga102.ch.intel.com with ESMTP; 29 Nov 2012 06:21:37 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,184,1355126400"; d="scan'208";a="173995034" Received: from unknown (HELO [10.255.13.102]) ([10.255.13.102]) by AZSMGA002.ch.intel.com with ESMTP; 29 Nov 2012 06:21:37 -0800 Message-ID: <1354198897.1530.0.camel@empanada> From: Tom Zanussi To: "Burton, Ross" Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 08:21:37 -0600 In-Reply-To: References: <1354133261.28084.102.camel@empanada> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.4.1 (3.4.1-2.fc17) Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: meta-intel@yoctoproject.org, darren.hart@intel.com, Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [meta-intel patch 0/3] Fixes for rescent X breakages in meta-intel layer X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 14:35:55 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Thu, 2012-11-29 at 11:27 +0000, Burton, Ross wrote: > On 28 November 2012 20:07, Tom Zanussi wrote: > > So does this conflict with Ross's patch, which seems simpler... > > I do prefer my patch as the same breakage will occur for anyone else > using oe-core master but also building their own older X server. > Whilst the delta is so minimal, I don't see the problem in supporting > both in oe-core. > I'll second that... Tom > Ross