From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 93-97-173-237.zone5.bethere.co.uk ([93.97.173.237] helo=tim.rpsys.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TgBWK-0004mJ-0j for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 05 Dec 2012 10:44:01 +0100 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id qB59TZ7O015669; Wed, 5 Dec 2012 09:29:35 GMT Received: from tim.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tim.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 15595-01; Wed, 5 Dec 2012 09:29:31 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [192.168.3.10] ([192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id qB59TSvr015662 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 5 Dec 2012 09:29:29 GMT Message-ID: <1354699758.25268.86.camel@ted> From: Richard Purdie To: Yi Qingliang Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2012 09:29:18 +0000 In-Reply-To: <1370507.95j740KEpU@yiqingliang-pc> References: <1370507.95j740KEpU@yiqingliang-pc> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.3-0ubuntu6 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rpsys.net Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: why recompile gcc-cross/eglibc when update linux package? X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2012 09:44:01 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 2012-12-05 at 10:16 +0000, Yi Qingliang wrote: > I update the kernel from 3.6.6 to 3.6.9, and recompile it: bitbake linux > > but it will recompile eglibc/gcc-cross first, so long time:( why? > the eglibc will use kernel header? if so, understand. > but what about gcc-cross? Did you change linux-libc-headers or the kernel itself? If you change the libc-headers, gcc-cross will rebuild since it depends on eglibc and as you mention, eglibc depends on the headers. Changing the target kernel recipe shouldn't rebuild any of those. Cheers, Richard