From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 93-97-173-237.zone5.bethere.co.uk ([93.97.173.237] helo=tim.rpsys.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TgHGZ-0007oG-HA for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 05 Dec 2012 16:52:07 +0100 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id qB5FbhtX019400; Wed, 5 Dec 2012 15:37:43 GMT Received: from tim.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tim.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 18639-07; Wed, 5 Dec 2012 15:37:39 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [192.168.3.10] ([192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id qB5FbZAZ019394 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 5 Dec 2012 15:37:35 GMT Message-ID: <1354721845.25268.118.camel@ted> From: Richard Purdie To: Martin Jansa Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2012 15:37:25 +0000 In-Reply-To: <20121205152442.GC3396@jama.jama.net> References: <1354716839.25268.105.camel@ted> <20121205144539.GA3396@jama.jama.net> <1354720793.25268.115.camel@ted> <20121205152442.GC3396@jama.jama.net> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.3-0ubuntu6 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rpsys.net Cc: openembedded-core Subject: Re: Switch to PR server model for PR bumps - 1 week X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2012 15:52:07 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 2012-12-05 at 16:24 +0100, Martin Jansa wrote: > On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 03:19:53PM +0000, Richard Purdie wrote: > > On Wed, 2012-12-05 at 15:45 +0100, Martin Jansa wrote: > > Added to the page: "As implemented, values from the PR service are > > included into the PR field as an addition of the form ".X" so r0 becomes > > r0.1, r0.2 and so on. This allows existing PR values to be used for > > whatever reasons allowing manual PR bumps should it be necessary." > > > > (should cover both questions) > > > > As for removing PR, as recipes are upgraded, I'm expecting we will > > remove PR values so we should get a smooth transition. We can still have > > PR values, it will just become an exception rather than the rule. > > So default "hidden" r0 is still used in such cases and PRSERV adds again > just .X. Exactly. > Thanks for answers. They were good questions :) Cheers, Richard