From: "Marko Katić" <dromede@gmail.com>
To: Otavio Salvador <otavio@ossystems.com.br>
Cc: Chris Larson <clarson@kergoth.com>,
Martin Jansa <martin.jansa@gmail.com>,
Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
<openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [PATCH] udev: Remove deprecated binaries from packaging
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 20:53:17 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1355428397.4799.7.camel@dromedary> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAP9ODKrQ1XQNwGz2D7HVcDeP1n7ndxCHTkiXD6tZotYLTMfKNA@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, 2012-11-20 at 18:23 -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 5:59 PM, Marko Katić <dromede@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 7:54 PM, Otavio Salvador
> > <otavio@ossystems.com.br> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 4:38 PM, Chris Larson <clarson@kergoth.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 11:02 AM, Marko Katić <dromede@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> A proper solution might be to:
> >>>>
> >>>> a) Leave udevtest and udevinfo in udev-utils to properly support older
> >>>> versions of udev that have these packages.
> >>>> b) Move udevadm into the main udev package. This makes a lot of sense
> >>>> since udevadm is crucial for proper udev operation.
> >>>> c) Remove udev-utils from RRECOMMENDS.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> This sounds like a clean, solid route to me. Hopefully someone else will
> >>> chime in with input on it as well.
> >>
> >>
> >> I see no value in having the others and deprecated tools available. Having
> >> udevadm available in udev-utils allows for it use with mdev for trigger the
> >> events in kernel, for example. I like to have this possibility.
> >>
> >> --
> >> Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
> >> E-mail: otavio@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br
> >> Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br
> >>
> >
> > Ok, so udevadm should stay in udev-utils. In that case i propose we:
> >
> > a) Add ${bindir}/udevadm and ${base_sbindir}/udevadm to
> > FILES_udev-utils. This should
> > ensure that udevadm will always go in udev-utils regardless of the
> > udev version being built.
> > This should also ensure that udev-utils package will always be made.
> >
> > b) Make udevadm available in both ${bindir} and ${base_sbindir} via
> > symlinks installed in
> > do_install_append. This should ensure proper support for all versions of udev.
>
> I like your plan.
>
> +1
>
Oh dear, i completely forgot about this patch. It's been sitting in my
local repo for weeks!
So here's my (hopefully) final solution:
diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/udev/udev.inc
b/meta/recipes-core/udev/udev.inc
index 4705b9b..677c33a 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-core/udev/udev.inc
+++ b/meta/recipes-core/udev/udev.inc
@@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ FILES_udev-cache = "${sysconfdir}/init.d/udev-cache
${sysconfdir}/default/udev-c
FILES_udev-acl = "${base_libdir}/udev/udev-acl
${base_libdir}/udev/rules.d/70-acl.rules"
-FILES_udev-utils = "${bindir}/udevinfo ${bindir}/udevtest
${base_sbindir}/udevadm"
+FILES_udev-utils = "${bindir}/udevinfo ${bindir}/udevtest
${base_sbindir}/udevadm ${bindir}/udevadm"
RDEPENDS_udev-consolekit += "udev-acl"
FILES_udev-consolekit = "${libdir}/ConsoleKit"
@@ -97,4 +97,19 @@ do_install_append () {
rm -f ${D}${base_libdir}/udev/hid2hci
echo 'udev_run="/var/run/udev"' >>
${D}${sysconfdir}/udev/udev.conf
+
+ #Starting with udev 176, udevadm is by default installed in
${bindir}.
+ #To properly support all versions of udev we make udevadm
available
+ #in ${bindir} and in ${base_sbindir}.
+
+ if [ "${PV}" -gt "175" ]
+ then
+ install -d ${D}${base_sbindir}
+ ln -s ${bindir}/udevadm ${D}${base_sbindir}/udevadm
+
+ else
+ install -d ${D}${bindir}
+ ln -s ${base_sbindir}/udevadm ${D}${bindir}/udevadm
+
+ fi
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-12-13 20:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-11-16 20:11 [PATCH] [PATCH] udev: Remove deprecated binaries from packaging dromede
2012-11-16 21:36 ` Martin Jansa
[not found] ` <CAHod+GfAof60ycR5EXosair15O87dvZhnxWSouhdF49x8sZQqQ@mail.gmail.com>
2012-11-16 22:28 ` Martin Jansa
2012-11-16 23:28 ` Chris Larson
2012-11-17 18:02 ` Marko Katić
2012-11-17 18:38 ` Chris Larson
2012-11-17 18:54 ` Otavio Salvador
2012-11-20 19:59 ` Marko Katić
2012-11-20 20:23 ` Otavio Salvador
2012-12-13 19:53 ` Marko Katić [this message]
2012-12-13 23:30 ` Otavio Salvador
2012-12-14 15:17 ` Marko Katić
2012-12-14 15:23 ` Otavio Salvador
2012-11-17 18:20 ` Otavio Salvador
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1355428397.4799.7.camel@dromedary \
--to=dromede@gmail.com \
--cc=clarson@kergoth.com \
--cc=martin.jansa@gmail.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
--cc=otavio@ossystems.com.br \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox