From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 93-97-173-237.zone5.bethere.co.uk ([93.97.173.237] helo=tim.rpsys.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TmqER-0006i8-Pj for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 19:25:04 +0100 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id qBNIA95f020473; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 18:10:09 GMT Received: from tim.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tim.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 23322-03; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 18:10:05 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [192.168.3.10] ([192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id qBNIA2XN020463 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 23 Dec 2012 18:10:04 GMT Message-ID: <1356286202.21913.21.camel@ted> From: Richard Purdie To: "Robert P. J. Day" Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2012 18:10:02 +0000 In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.3-0ubuntu6 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rpsys.net Cc: OE Core mailing list Subject: Re: is defining an empty task same as "[noexec]" task flag? X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2012 18:25:04 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Sun, 2012-12-23 at 10:23 -0600, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > is overriding something like do_compile() like this: > > do_compile() { > : > } This will get run but does nothing. > equivalent to: > > do_compile[noexec] = "1" Bitbake won't even fork() a process to try and execute this so its marginally more efficient. Cheers, Richard