From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 93-97-173-237.zone5.bethere.co.uk ([93.97.173.237] helo=tim.rpsys.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TsCwu-0004QV-JU for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 07 Jan 2013 14:41:09 +0100 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r07DPuxs004767; Mon, 7 Jan 2013 13:25:56 GMT Received: from tim.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tim.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 04131-02; Mon, 7 Jan 2013 13:25:52 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [192.168.3.10] ([192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r07DPmLX004760 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 7 Jan 2013 13:25:49 GMT Message-ID: <1357565150.25855.11.camel@ted> From: Richard Purdie To: Philip Balister Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2013 13:25:50 +0000 In-Reply-To: <50E70BBE.1000607@balister.org> References: <50E70742.6060201@balister.org> <50E70BBE.1000607@balister.org> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.3-0ubuntu6 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rpsys.net Cc: openembedded-core Subject: Re: Recipes with SRC_URI in .inc file and checksum in bb file X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2013 13:41:09 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Fri, 2013-01-04 at 12:05 -0500, Philip Balister wrote: > On 01/04/2013 11:59 AM, Marko Lindqvist wrote: > > On 4 January 2013 18:45, Philip Balister wrote: > >> > >> I am on the process of updating the fftw recipes to the most recent > >> version. Along the way I noticed it looks like the checksum test is > >> being ignored. The only way I can get it to fail is to remove all the > >> checksum entries from the bb files. > > > > I've got this kind of problems when I have made several iterations of > > the recipe update. In my case the explanation has always been that > > first test already downloaded the file, so no matter what I do to > > checksums after that, there's no download + checksum check on later > > tests. > > Remove file and .done from download, + 'bitbake -c clean' > > I uderstand that, but the other problem is even with a new download, the > checksum check is ignored if there are checksum entries in more than one > bb file. Multiple checksums in different .bb files for the same filename? Cheers, Richard