From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 93-97-173-237.zone5.bethere.co.uk ([93.97.173.237] helo=tim.rpsys.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TvRwI-00006x-4w for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 16 Jan 2013 13:17:54 +0100 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r0GC2V55023858; Wed, 16 Jan 2013 12:02:31 GMT Received: from tim.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tim.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 20832-03; Wed, 16 Jan 2013 12:02:27 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [192.168.3.10] ([192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r0GC2ODZ023851 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 16 Jan 2013 12:02:25 GMT Message-ID: <1358337744.8129.3.camel@ted> From: Richard Purdie To: Marko Lindqvist Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2013 12:02:24 +0000 In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.3-0ubuntu6 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rpsys.net Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/12] Prepare recipes for automake-1.13 (batch #3) X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2013 12:17:56 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tue, 2013-01-15 at 13:57 +0200, Marko Lindqvist wrote: > As more and more packages seem to have automake-1.13 related problems, > it's becoming clear that I cannot fix world alone. I'm about to fix > packages in openembedded-core the way I've been doing, but for supporting > unfixed packages in other layers it would make sense to patch our > version of automake-1.13 to still support AM_CONFIG_HEADER (the most > common problem by far). We can drop that patch once most of the world > has been updated to versions that work without. Agreed, this does sound like the sensible way to go for us for now. I appreciate the work you're doing on this! Cheers, Richard