From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from dan.rpsys.net ([93.97.175.187]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TykIZ-0006Az-S8 for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Fri, 25 Jan 2013 15:30:32 +0100 Received: from localhost (dan.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-2.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id r0PEIHTf030165; Fri, 25 Jan 2013 14:19:01 GMT X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at dan.rpsys.net Received: from dan.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (dan.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id fdTIfzBc24+r; Fri, 25 Jan 2013 14:19:01 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [192.168.3.10] (rpvlan0 [192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-2.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id r0PEIqhQ030185 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 25 Jan 2013 14:18:55 GMT Message-ID: <1359123271.13917.1.camel@ted> From: Richard Purdie To: "Burton, Ross" Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2013 14:14:31 +0000 In-Reply-To: References: <680bfa5f6dd8d3a3e77a18240caab373f03b8006.1359014474.git.Qi.Chen@windriver.com> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.6.2-0ubuntu0.1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: Zhenfeng.Zhao@windriver.com, openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/12] initscripts: inherit volatiles to support read-only rootfs X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2013 14:30:33 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Fri, 2013-01-25 at 13:11 +0000, Burton, Ross wrote: > On 24 January 2013 08:16, wrote: > > +VOLATILE_DIR = "/var/volatile/lib/urandom" > > +VOLATILE_LINK = "/var/lib/urandom" > > A better solution would be to not attempt to save and restore a seed > value that is intended to persist across reboots when it's on a tmpfs. > Putting the urandom seed into tmpfs is just a waste of time. I have to wonder why we don't put a union mount tmpfs over /var/lib to be honest... or if we don't want to depend on unionfs, a tmpfs over /var/lib... Cheers, Richard