Re: [CONSOLIDATED PULL 00/69] master-next & MUT (post M3)

[Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>]

On Mon, 2013-02-04 at 16:11 +0100, David Nyström wrote:
> On 02/01/2013 09:19 AM, Saul Wold wrote:
> > Richard,
> >
> > Here is a group of M4 patches and updates that have been
> > pending. I fixed a small issue I found with the package.bbclass
> > changes in gkt-icon-cache.bbclass
> >
> > I have included the DEB Incremental image set along with
> > the READ-Only Rootfs changes, this way they can get broader
> > views and usage by the community.
> >
> > I have also include the GCC Multilib changes.
> >
> > I just started the AB on MUT without some failing patches
> > (netbase and flex).
> >
> > Please watch it's status, There was a failure in the x86 GRUB
> > build which may also point back to Flex.
> >
> > Sau!
> >
> > This include
> > The following changes since commit 1489a69cecb1dcc3502a4c24beaea81e6ca6dacc:
> >
> >    harfbuzz: fix install of version.h (2013-01-31 12:29:18 +0000)
> >
> > are available in the git repository at:
> >
> >    git://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core-contrib sgw/stage
> >    http://cgit.openembedded.org/cgit.cgi/openembedded-core-contrib/log/?h=sgw/stage
> >
> >
> > David Nyström (1):
> >    Lets face it, adding python dependencies is really a painful manual
> >      process, due to setuptools/distutils, ignoring anything other than
> >      python dependencies.
> 
> 
> Please drop above as well, it was an RFC meant to stir up some 
> discussion, not meant for inclusion.

It didn't make it past my review since the commit message isn't
appropriate. Your second version looks better and is queued in
master-next though.

Cheers,

Richard