From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from dan.rpsys.net ([93.97.175.187]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U768O-0002GW-NE for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 16:26:38 +0100 Received: from localhost (dan.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-2.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id r1HFGkGw021327; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 15:16:46 GMT X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at dan.rpsys.net Received: from dan.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (dan.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id bpJEo3TdHhZN; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 15:16:45 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [192.168.3.10] (rpvlan0 [192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-2.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id r1HFGcNX021323 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Sun, 17 Feb 2013 15:16:41 GMT Message-ID: <1361113811.32271.7.camel@ted> From: Richard Purdie To: Otavio Salvador Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2013 15:10:11 +0000 In-Reply-To: References: <1361049644-27904-1-git-send-email-otavio@ossystems.com.br> <1361049644-27904-2-git-send-email-otavio@ossystems.com.br> <1361087244.31795.105.camel@ted> <1361108669.32271.1.camel@ted> <1361112495.32271.5.camel@ted> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.6.3-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: OpenEmbedded Core Mailing List Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] dbus: Drop libx11 dependency when building without 'x11' distro feature X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2013 15:26:39 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Sun, 2013-02-17 at 11:52 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: > On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 11:48 AM, Richard Purdie > wrote: > > On Sun, 2013-02-17 at 10:55 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: > >> On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 10:44 AM, Richard Purdie > >> wrote: > >> > On Sun, 2013-02-17 at 10:40 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: > >> >> On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 4:47 AM, Richard Purdie > >> >> wrote: > >> >> > On Sat, 2013-02-16 at 19:20 -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote: > >> >> >> Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador > >> >> >> --- > >> >> >> meta/recipes-core/dbus/dbus.inc | 2 +- > >> >> >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > >> >> >> > >> >> >> diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/dbus/dbus.inc b/meta/recipes-core/dbus/dbus.inc > >> >> >> index 292ab29..cebab28 100644 > >> >> >> --- a/meta/recipes-core/dbus/dbus.inc > >> >> >> +++ b/meta/recipes-core/dbus/dbus.inc > >> >> >> @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://COPYING;md5=10dded3b58148f3f1fd804b26354af3e \ > >> >> >> X11DEPENDS = "virtual/libx11 libsm" > >> >> >> DEPENDS = "expat virtual/libintl ${@base_contains('DISTRO_FEATURES', 'x11', '${X11DEPENDS}', '', d)}" > >> >> >> DEPENDS_class-native = "expat-native virtual/libintl-native" > >> >> >> -DEPENDS_class-nativesdk = "nativesdk-expat virtual/nativesdk-libintl virtual/libx11" > >> >> >> +DEPENDS_class-nativesdk = "nativesdk-expat virtual/nativesdk-libintl ${@base_contains('DISTRO_FEATURES', 'x11', 'virtual/libx11', '', d)}" > >> >> >> RDEPENDS_dbus = "${@base_contains('DISTRO_FEATURES', 'ptest', 'dbus-ptest', '', d)}" > >> >> >> RDEPENDS_class-native = "" > >> >> > > >> >> > This tends to be a really bad idea for dbus-nativesdk. If you install an > >> >> > SDK compiled with these options into PATH only a system which does have > >> >> > x11, it will break functionality in a way unacceptable to users. > >> >> > >> >> I don't see how it'd break anything being deployed in a toolchain. We > >> >> don't initialize the dbus daemon so it is mostly used to fulfill > >> >> dependencies. > >> > > >> > Imagine you source the toolchain setup script. The limited functionality > >> > dbus-launch just got into PATH. Now you run some X application. Things > >> > break. > >> > >> You usually to not source the env script and run your X server on top > >> of it, I think. Personally I source it in a terminal session inside of > >> X and use it to build things only. > > > > No, but people do open a terminal in X and then source the script there, > > then run other X applications from within the terminal window. Those X > > applications can use dbus activation. A dbus-launch without x11 support > > causes problems in this situation. > > Yes; got it. > > So your idea is to avoid x11 dependency altogether and drop > dbus-launch to avoid this errors? Yes, I did the same thing with dbus-native for exactly this reason (e.g. X apps from within a devshell). I didn't touch dbus-nativesdk since it has the X dependency and I didn't think it was bothering anyone. Cheers, Richard