From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from dan.rpsys.net ([93.97.175.187]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UCCfF-0008FG-GA for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Sun, 03 Mar 2013 18:25:36 +0100 Received: from localhost (dan.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-2.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id r23HGE5d006419; Sun, 3 Mar 2013 17:16:28 GMT X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at dan.rpsys.net Received: from dan.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (dan.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id BuEfwSXYNyAC; Sun, 3 Mar 2013 17:16:28 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [192.168.3.10] (rpvlan0 [192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-2.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id r23HGNNq006448 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Sun, 3 Mar 2013 17:16:26 GMT Message-ID: <1362330514.4325.30.camel@ted> From: Richard Purdie To: Khem Raj Date: Sun, 03 Mar 2013 17:08:34 +0000 In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Evolution 3.6.3-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: Enrico Scholz , openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: libgcc_s.so not stripped X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Mar 2013 17:25:46 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 2012-08-22 at 13:25 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 1:15 PM, Enrico Scholz > wrote: > > > > I just noticed that libgcc_s.so.1 is not stripped in the .ipk. Is > > there any reason to keep the debug symbols? Uncompressed, this makes a > > difference of more than 1 MB. > > I dont see a reason to have debug info there. Symbol table probably > should be left in. I noticed this when clearing out old emails and I've just posted a patch for it. Worryingly, there are other non-executables in the lib directories which aren't getting stripped. I've opened a bug: https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3973 Cheers, Richard