From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from dan.rpsys.net ([93.97.175.187]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UCScr-0007pZ-14 for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 04 Mar 2013 11:28:25 +0100 Received: from localhost (dan.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-2.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id r24AJOIQ023543; Mon, 4 Mar 2013 10:19:24 GMT X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at dan.rpsys.net Received: from dan.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (dan.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id xu-XAaKmxgxj; Mon, 4 Mar 2013 10:19:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [192.168.3.10] (rpvlan0 [192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-2.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id r24AJJtu023521 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 4 Mar 2013 10:19:22 GMT Message-ID: <1362391887.29587.5.camel@ted> From: Richard Purdie To: Martin Jansa Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2013 10:11:27 +0000 In-Reply-To: <20130304081846.GC3268@jama> References: <1362360870-12148-1-git-send-email-randy.macleod@windriver.com> <20130304081846.GC3268@jama> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.6.3-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] apr: add libtool to SSTATE_SCAN_FILES X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2013 10:28:33 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Mon, 2013-03-04 at 09:18 +0100, Martin Jansa wrote: > On Sun, Mar 03, 2013 at 08:34:30PM -0500, randy.macleod@windriver.com wrote: > > From: Jackie Huang > > > > The hardcoded paths in libtool will cause apache2 compile fail at > > link stage when the package apr is installed from sstate cache, so > > add libtool to SSTATE_SCAN_FILES. > > > > [ CQID: WIND00405372 ] > > You can drop this. Is this really a big problem? I can understand people wanting to be able to track commits back to defect reports... Cheers, Richard