From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.pbcl.net ([88.198.119.4] helo=hetzner.pbcl.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UE6vv-0005n8-W0 for Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Sat, 09 Mar 2013 00:42:40 +0100 Received: from blundell.swaffham-prior.co.uk ([91.216.112.25] helo=[192.168.114.6]) by hetzner.pbcl.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UE6fv-00053m-7P; Sat, 09 Mar 2013 00:26:07 +0100 Message-ID: <1362785133.19943.9.camel@x121e.pbcl.net> From: Phil Blundell To: Rich Dubielzig Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2013 23:25:33 +0000 In-Reply-To: <1362780455-31958-1-git-send-email-rich.dubielzig@windriver.com> References: <1362780455-31958-1-git-send-email-rich.dubielzig@windriver.com> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.4.4-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] eglibc: Handle QA warnings in nativesdk (denzil) X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2013 23:42:43 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Fri, 2013-03-08 at 14:07 -0800, Rich Dubielzig wrote: > -FILES_${PN}-utils = "${bindir}/* ${sbindir}/*" > +FILES_${PN}-utils = "${bindir}/* ${sbindir}/* ${base_sbindir}/ldconfig ${sysconfdir}/ld.so.conf" Is that really correct? There seem to be several slightly dubious things about this patch: 1. In the version of oe-core I'm looking at, both ldconfig and ld.so.conf go into ${PN} if USE_LDCONFIG=1, which is the default. (Arguably this ought really to be a DISTRO_FEATURE nowadays.) So, adding them unconditionally to PN-utils seems like it is confusing at best. 2. ld.so.conf isn't a utility and it isn't entirely obvious that it belongs in PN-utils at all. 3. Your commit message didn't mention the change to ldconfig, and also didn't give any details of what exactly the QA warnings were that it was fixing. thanks p.