From: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
To: "Burton, Ross" <ross.burton@intel.com>
Cc: otavio@ossystems.com.br, openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gtk+: don't provide gtk-update-icon-cache-native
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 10:56:00 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1364381760.28471.7.camel@ted> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJTo0LbxZfG5M4koRxRFCLDmfjxn2afT2Sd=cfFvr04BoU=i7g@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, 2013-03-27 at 10:23 +0000, Burton, Ross wrote:
> Hi Andreas,
>
> On 27 March 2013 08:27, Andreas Müller <schnitzeltony@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > meta-browser: chromium
>
> The latest commit to the Chromium 24 recipe changes gtk+-native to
> gtk+, so it appears that any gtk+-native references you're seeing are
> bad and the same fix should be applied to the other versions.
>
> > openembedded-core: packagegroup-toolset-native
>
> This is a packagegroup that builds ~all of the native packages.
>
> > openembedded-core: sstate.bbclass
>
> def isPostInstDep(x):
> if x in ["qemu-native", "gdk-pixbuf-native", "gtk+-native",
> "qemuwrapper-cross", "depmodwrapper-cross",
> "systemd-systemctl-native", "gtk-update-icon-cache-native"]:
> return True
> return False
>
> Some sstate black magic.
That can just be removed if we don't use gtk+-native in any postinsts
which I don't believe we do now...
> > openembedded-core: seperatebuilddir.inc
>
> Just a variable saying it can be built out of tree.
Right, that can also just be dropped.
> packagegroup-toolset-native is the only place that actually uses
> gtk+-native, so anyone actually using that for whatever purpose will
> need to set the preferred provider.
This can also just get dropped, it was only there to allow building the
collection of native recipes.
So as far as I'm concerned all these references can just be removed.
Cheers,
Richard
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-27 11:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-25 23:47 [PATCH] gtk+: don't provide gtk-update-icon-cache-native Andreas Müller
2013-03-26 10:32 ` Burton, Ross
2013-03-26 11:40 ` Andreas Müller
2013-03-26 11:48 ` Richard Purdie
[not found] ` <CALbNGRSvGR75F4-bg123eQhTFaM_ex9Rs=Hyo2-Y6o8m2v9w0Q@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <1364340556.28471.2.camel@ted>
[not found] ` <CALbNGRQE4kGAmeXQ2TqfVqb4rFkQeQJua6COxBEvQNh-FbAKSg@mail.gmail.com>
2013-03-27 8:27 ` Andreas Müller
2013-03-27 10:23 ` Burton, Ross
2013-03-27 10:56 ` Richard Purdie [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1364381760.28471.7.camel@ted \
--to=richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
--cc=otavio@ossystems.com.br \
--cc=ross.burton@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox