From: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Otavio Salvador <otavio@ossystems.com.br>
Cc: OpenEmbedded Core Mailing List
<openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] base.bbclass: Fix matching of MACHINEOVERRIDES in COMPATIBLE_MACHINE
Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2013 22:31:02 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1365456662.12407.61.camel@ted> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1365454686-951-1-git-send-email-otavio@ossystems.com.br>
On Mon, 2013-04-08 at 17:58 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> When a MACHINEOVERRIDES has more than one value, split by ':' as usual
> OVERRIDES, this were not being properly checked in COMPATIBLE_MACHINE
> matching as we need to iterate over each SoC family and check if it is
> compatible or not.
>
> Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador <otavio@ossystems.com.br>
> ---
> Changes for v3:
> - Stop checking for SOC_FAMILY as it is just for compatibility with
> old BSPs; we move to MACHINEOVERRIDES for this case (RP)
>
> meta/classes/base.bbclass | 11 ++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/meta/classes/base.bbclass b/meta/classes/base.bbclass
> index abd6a52..313359c 100644
> --- a/meta/classes/base.bbclass
> +++ b/meta/classes/base.bbclass
> @@ -515,11 +515,12 @@ python () {
> need_machine = d.getVar('COMPATIBLE_MACHINE', True)
> if need_machine:
> import re
> - this_machine = d.getVar('MACHINE', True)
> - if this_machine and not re.match(need_machine, this_machine):
> - this_soc_family = d.getVar('SOC_FAMILY', True)
> - if (this_soc_family and not re.match(need_machine, this_soc_family)) or not this_soc_family:
> - raise bb.parse.SkipPackage("incompatible with machine %s (not in COMPATIBLE_MACHINE)" % this_machine)
> + compat_machines.extend((d.getVar('MACHINEOVERRIDES', True) or "").split(":"))
No variable "compat_machines" exists before this line so this patch
cannot possibly work. What did you test?
We're close to release and I'm getting pushed hard in places like IRC to
take patches like this which clearly don't work :(
I'm not happy.
Cheers,
Richard
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-08 21:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-08 20:58 [PATCH v3] base.bbclass: Fix matching of MACHINEOVERRIDES in COMPATIBLE_MACHINE Otavio Salvador
2013-04-08 21:29 ` Otavio Salvador
2013-04-08 21:31 ` Richard Purdie [this message]
2013-04-08 21:33 ` Otavio Salvador
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1365456662.12407.61.camel@ted \
--to=richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
--cc=otavio@ossystems.com.br \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox