From: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Laurentiu Palcu <laurentiu.palcu@intel.com>
Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] postinst-intercepts, qemu.bbclass: fix segfaults in postinstalls
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 09:03:12 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1365580992.16702.5.camel@ted> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <516516F3.5000401@intel.com>
On Wed, 2013-04-10 at 10:38 +0300, Laurentiu Palcu wrote:
>
> On 04/10/2013 12:58 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
> > On Tue, 2013-04-09 at 18:53 +0300, Laurentiu Palcu wrote:
> >> Postinstalls that use qemu are throwing a segmentation fault when
> >> building for qemux86-64 on a 64bit host (it might also happen for
> >> qemux86 if building on a 32bit host but I didn't test). It looks like
> >> qemu looks for ld.so.cache which is not found because it is generated
> >> after rootfs_(rpm|ipk|deb)_do_rootfs is called and then it tries to load
> >> libraries from the default paths (which are the host's). In order to
> >> avoid this, pass the LD_LIBRARY_PATH explicitly to the target's dynamic
> >> loader.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Laurentiu Palcu <laurentiu.palcu@intel.com>
> >> ---
> >> meta/classes/qemu.bbclass | 4 +++-
> >> scripts/postinst-intercepts/update_font_cache | 3 ++-
> >> scripts/postinst-intercepts/update_pixbuf_cache | 3 ++-
> >> 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/meta/classes/qemu.bbclass b/meta/classes/qemu.bbclass
> >> index 0e71d6a..6881826 100644
> >> --- a/meta/classes/qemu.bbclass
> >> +++ b/meta/classes/qemu.bbclass
> >> @@ -29,4 +29,6 @@ def qemu_run_binary(data, rootfs_path, binary):
> >> if qemu_binary == "qemu-allarch":
> >> qemu_binary = "qemuwrapper"
> >>
> >> - return "PSEUDO_UNLOAD=1 " + qemu_binary + " -L " + rootfs_path + " " + rootfs_path + binary
> >> + return "PSEUDO_UNLOAD=1 " + qemu_binary + " -L " + rootfs_path\
> >> + + " -E LD_LIBRARY_PATH=" + rootfs_path + "/lib:" + rootfs_path\
> >> + + "/usr/lib " + rootfs_path + binary
> >
> > This isn't going to work with multilibs. Can we reorder the rootfs code
> > so the ld.so.cache piece happens before the intercepts?
> I keep forgetting about multilib... :( I'll find another way.
> Unfortunately, it's not enough to generate ld.so.cache before running
> the intercept hooks because there are other package postinstalls that
> need qemu and those will be run before that. What if, instead of
> hardcoding, we use ${libdir} and ${base_libdir}?. These should always
> point to the right locations even when working with multilib.
With any given binary, you're not going to know which libdir is the
right one though?
Looking at a multilib image, the cache is bust on multilib anyway. In
reality this just makes things slower, it will still work. The source to
ldconfig-native hardcodes LIBDIR/SLIBDIR.
What is the path being used for? Just to find ld.so? Once we get ld.so,
does it provide the right paths from then onwards? If I understand the
changes here, we appear to by bypassing ld.so?
Cheers,
Richard
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-10 8:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-09 15:53 [PATCH] postinst-intercepts, qemu.bbclass: fix segfaults in postinstalls Laurentiu Palcu
2013-04-09 21:58 ` Richard Purdie
2013-04-10 7:38 ` Laurentiu Palcu
2013-04-10 8:03 ` Richard Purdie [this message]
2013-04-10 11:25 ` [PATCH v2] " Laurentiu Palcu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1365580992.16702.5.camel@ted \
--to=richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=laurentiu.palcu@intel.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox