From: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Mark Hatle <mark.hatle@windriver.com>
Cc: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>,
openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: useradd.bbclass question
Date: Thu, 02 May 2013 16:06:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1367507201.5379.132.camel@ted> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51827D4B.4070907@windriver.com>
On Thu, 2013-05-02 at 09:50 -0500, Mark Hatle wrote:
> On 5/2/13 9:34 AM, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> > On Thursday 02 May 2013 08:35:55 Mark Hatle wrote:
> >> On 5/2/13 2:49 AM, Andreas Müller wrote:
> >>> on one of my build machines useradd.bbclass seem to use the UID/GID of
> >>> build host. On other machines useradd works correct.
> >>>
> >>> I have the follwing in gdm:
> >>>
> >>> <snip>
> >>> do_install_append() {
> >>>
> >>> ...
> >>> chown -R gdm:gdm ${D}${localstatedir}/lib/gdm
> >>> chmod 0750 ${D}${localstatedir}/lib/gdm
> >>>
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>> ...
> >>>
> >>> USERADD_PACKAGES = "${PN}"
> >>> USERADD_PARAM_${PN} = "--system --no-create-home --home
> >>> ${localstatedir}/lib/gdm --user-group gdm"
> >>> <snip/>
>
> I don't know how ipk and deb handle this. But with the RPM system it captures
> the uname/gname (not uid/gid) and uses that when installing the file(s). This
> way the USERADD is processed before the install and the right value is used
> during the install.
>
> We may have a problem here where we need to also process the useradd -before-
> the do_install runs so that it's available for pseudo to use for deb/ipk.
No problem, see below.
> (But
> if deb/ipk capture uid/gid vs uname/gname.. unless we set a static value we
> could still have a problem.)
>
> Does anyone know how ipk/deb handle this?
The same way rpm does. We have a preinst that sets things up before the
files get extracted. The extraction then preserves the users.
> >>>
> >>> In sysroot /etc/group I see
> >>> gdm:x:990:
> >>>
> >>> In sysroot /etc/group I see
> >>> gdm:!:993:990::/var/lib/gdm:
> >>>
> >>> The folder in packet/image has IDs 42:42 which is taken from build host.
> >>
> >> This says that something ran an operation outside of the pseudo environment.
> >> So it fell back to looking up the uid from the host system. (The
> >> alternative is the item was installed -before- the /etc/passwd,/etc/group
> >> was written to the disk.
> >
> > Right, do_install will be well before this stuff happens and it is not a
> > fakeroot task anyway. This needs to be moved to a postinstall script (which
> > should be able to run during image creation).
>
> do_install is a 'fakeroot' task. But ya, the useradd action doesn't necessarily
> happen before it.
Yes it does. useradd.bbclass says:
do_install[prefuncs] += "${SYSROOTFUNC}"
and that call sets up the user in advance. pseudo is set to use the
passwd/group files we add the entries to.
So this does all work and is used by dbus.
> We should -not- be using a postinstall action to change user/groups on
> files/directories. This breaks the integrity checking that RPM has. You can
> (on the target) issue an rpm -V <package> and it will go and verify the
> installed files (including permissions, user, group) match what the RPM database
> says. Making the change in a postinstall will cause a validation failure.
Right.
Cheers,
Richard
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-02 15:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-02 7:49 useradd.bbclass question Andreas Müller
2013-05-02 13:35 ` Mark Hatle
2013-05-02 14:34 ` Paul Eggleton
2013-05-02 14:43 ` Andreas Müller
2013-05-02 14:49 ` Richard Purdie
2013-05-02 14:53 ` Paul Eggleton
2013-05-02 14:50 ` Mark Hatle
2013-05-02 14:55 ` Andreas Müller
2013-05-02 15:09 ` Mark Hatle
2013-05-02 15:18 ` Andreas Müller
2013-05-02 15:31 ` Andreas Müller
2013-05-02 15:53 ` Mark Hatle
2013-05-02 16:40 ` Andreas Müller
2013-05-02 17:03 ` Andreas Müller
2013-05-02 15:51 ` Mark Hatle
2013-05-02 15:06 ` Richard Purdie [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1367507201.5379.132.camel@ted \
--to=richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=mark.hatle@windriver.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
--cc=paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox