From: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Tomas Frydrych <tf+lists.yocto@r-finger.com>
Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
<openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: proposal to move cogl, clutter and related recipes from oe-core to dedicated meta-clutter layer
Date: Wed, 08 May 2013 16:23:38 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1368026618.27116.52.camel@ted> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <518A6B25.5000108@r-finger.com>
On Wed, 2013-05-08 at 16:11 +0100, Tomas Frydrych wrote:
> I think it would makes sense to move clutter related packages from
> oe-core into a dedicated layer:
>
> * AFAIK nothing in oe-core requires cogl/clutter/mx,
>
> * The packages in oe-core are effectively unmaintained, several upstream
> releases behind, and pretty much unusable,
>
> * The somewhat random nature of clutter and cogl releases makes it hard
> to sensibly manage these packages within the oe-core release cycle, but
> a dedicated layer could follow the upstream developments.
>
>
> I have started work on new clutter and related packages for use by
> meta-guacamayo at https://github.com/Guacamayo/meta-clutter, but I'd be
> more than happy for the layer to live somewhere else and become the
> canonical location for clutter-related bits and pieces.
I have no idea why you've always felt the need to maintain the clutter
pieces in your own layer rather than interacting with the ones in
OE-Core instead which I'd love to see better maintained. I'm not aware
of any barrier that has prevented that.
I can't help feeling this is an artificially created problem :/.
Cheers,
Richard
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-08 15:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-08 15:11 proposal to move cogl, clutter and related recipes from oe-core to dedicated meta-clutter layer Tomas Frydrych
2013-05-08 15:23 ` Phil Blundell
2013-05-08 16:34 ` Tomas Frydrych
2013-05-08 15:23 ` Richard Purdie [this message]
2013-05-08 16:20 ` Tomas Frydrych
2013-05-10 9:05 ` Richard Purdie
2013-05-10 10:56 ` Tomas Frydrych
2013-05-10 11:32 ` Richard Purdie
2013-05-10 16:39 ` Tomas Frydrych
2013-05-10 17:19 ` Richard Purdie
2013-05-10 20:22 ` Otavio Salvador
2013-05-10 20:37 ` Mark Hatle
2013-05-10 21:15 ` Otavio Salvador
2013-05-13 9:30 ` Tomas Frydrych
2013-05-13 15:41 ` Phil Blundell
2013-05-13 15:44 ` Burton, Ross
2013-05-14 9:14 ` Tomas Frydrych
2013-05-14 16:55 ` Paul Eggleton
2013-05-15 9:19 ` Tomas Frydrych
2013-05-15 9:49 ` Paul Eggleton
2013-05-15 11:35 ` Tomas Frydrych
2013-05-15 11:53 ` Otavio Salvador
2013-05-15 13:20 ` Andreas Oberritter
2013-05-15 14:09 ` Paul Eggleton
2013-05-15 16:34 ` Tomas Frydrych
2013-05-15 16:54 ` Otavio Salvador
2013-05-15 17:22 ` Paul Eggleton
2013-05-15 17:30 ` Richard Purdie
2013-05-15 17:36 ` Otavio Salvador
2013-05-15 18:24 ` Paul Eggleton
2013-05-15 19:28 ` Otavio Salvador
2013-05-15 20:49 ` Phil Blundell
2013-05-16 9:01 ` Tomas Frydrych
2013-05-16 10:35 ` Phil Blundell
2013-05-16 11:21 ` Tomas Frydrych
2013-05-16 14:35 ` Phil Blundell
2013-05-17 12:30 ` Paul Eggleton
2013-05-16 9:22 ` Tomas Frydrych
2013-05-15 19:43 ` Richard Purdie
2013-05-16 9:21 ` Tomas Frydrych
2013-05-10 21:07 ` Martin Jansa
2013-05-10 22:18 ` Richard Purdie
2013-05-11 20:39 ` Otavio Salvador
2013-05-11 21:49 ` Richard Purdie
2013-05-14 16:23 ` Philip Balister
2013-05-13 9:31 ` Tomas Frydrych
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1368026618.27116.52.camel@ted \
--to=richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
--cc=tf+lists.yocto@r-finger.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox