Openembedded Core Discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Tomas Frydrych <tf+lists.yocto@r-finger.com>
Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
	<openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: proposal to move cogl, clutter and related recipes from oe-core to dedicated meta-clutter layer
Date: Wed, 08 May 2013 16:23:38 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1368026618.27116.52.camel@ted> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <518A6B25.5000108@r-finger.com>

On Wed, 2013-05-08 at 16:11 +0100, Tomas Frydrych wrote:
> I think it would makes sense to move clutter related packages from
> oe-core into a dedicated layer:
> 
> * AFAIK nothing in oe-core requires cogl/clutter/mx,
> 
> * The packages in oe-core are effectively unmaintained, several upstream
> releases behind, and pretty much unusable,
> 
> * The somewhat random nature of clutter and cogl releases makes it hard
> to sensibly manage these packages within the oe-core release cycle, but
> a dedicated layer could follow the upstream developments.
> 
> 
> I have started work on new clutter and related packages for use by
> meta-guacamayo at https://github.com/Guacamayo/meta-clutter, but I'd be
> more than happy for the layer to live somewhere else and become the
> canonical location for clutter-related bits and pieces.

I have no idea why you've always felt the need to maintain the clutter
pieces in your own layer rather than interacting with the ones in
OE-Core instead which I'd love to see better maintained. I'm not aware
of any barrier that has prevented that.

I can't help feeling this is an artificially created problem :/.

Cheers,

Richard




  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-05-08 15:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-05-08 15:11 proposal to move cogl, clutter and related recipes from oe-core to dedicated meta-clutter layer Tomas Frydrych
2013-05-08 15:23 ` Phil Blundell
2013-05-08 16:34   ` Tomas Frydrych
2013-05-08 15:23 ` Richard Purdie [this message]
2013-05-08 16:20   ` Tomas Frydrych
2013-05-10  9:05     ` Richard Purdie
2013-05-10 10:56       ` Tomas Frydrych
2013-05-10 11:32         ` Richard Purdie
2013-05-10 16:39           ` Tomas Frydrych
2013-05-10 17:19             ` Richard Purdie
2013-05-10 20:22               ` Otavio Salvador
2013-05-10 20:37                 ` Mark Hatle
2013-05-10 21:15                   ` Otavio Salvador
2013-05-13  9:30                   ` Tomas Frydrych
2013-05-13 15:41                     ` Phil Blundell
2013-05-13 15:44                       ` Burton, Ross
2013-05-14  9:14                       ` Tomas Frydrych
2013-05-14 16:55                         ` Paul Eggleton
2013-05-15  9:19                           ` Tomas Frydrych
2013-05-15  9:49                             ` Paul Eggleton
2013-05-15 11:35                               ` Tomas Frydrych
2013-05-15 11:53                                 ` Otavio Salvador
2013-05-15 13:20                                   ` Andreas Oberritter
2013-05-15 14:09                                 ` Paul Eggleton
2013-05-15 16:34                                   ` Tomas Frydrych
2013-05-15 16:54                                     ` Otavio Salvador
2013-05-15 17:22                                     ` Paul Eggleton
2013-05-15 17:30                                     ` Richard Purdie
2013-05-15 17:36                                       ` Otavio Salvador
2013-05-15 18:24                                         ` Paul Eggleton
2013-05-15 19:28                                           ` Otavio Salvador
2013-05-15 20:49                                             ` Phil Blundell
2013-05-16  9:01                                               ` Tomas Frydrych
2013-05-16 10:35                                                 ` Phil Blundell
2013-05-16 11:21                                                   ` Tomas Frydrych
2013-05-16 14:35                                                     ` Phil Blundell
2013-05-17 12:30                                                   ` Paul Eggleton
2013-05-16  9:22                                           ` Tomas Frydrych
2013-05-15 19:43                                       ` Richard Purdie
2013-05-16  9:21                                         ` Tomas Frydrych
2013-05-10 21:07                 ` Martin Jansa
2013-05-10 22:18                 ` Richard Purdie
2013-05-11 20:39                   ` Otavio Salvador
2013-05-11 21:49                     ` Richard Purdie
2013-05-14 16:23                       ` Philip Balister
2013-05-13  9:31                   ` Tomas Frydrych

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1368026618.27116.52.camel@ted \
    --to=richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
    --cc=tf+lists.yocto@r-finger.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox