From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from dan.rpsys.net ([93.97.175.187]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Ucfp6-00025D-8Z for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 15 May 2013 19:49:12 +0200 Received: from localhost (dan.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-2.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id r4FHXsK7013379; Wed, 15 May 2013 18:33:55 +0100 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at dan.rpsys.net Received: from dan.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (dan.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 1qUKS_O4L4UT; Wed, 15 May 2013 18:33:54 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.3.10] (rpvlan0 [192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-2.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id r4FHXlg0013368 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 15 May 2013 18:33:50 +0100 Message-ID: <1368639038.18324.6.camel@ted> From: Richard Purdie To: Tomas Frydrych Date: Wed, 15 May 2013 20:30:38 +0300 In-Reply-To: <5193B925.6010607@r-finger.com> References: <518A6B25.5000108@r-finger.com> <3057509.dy5Cs7AUqs@helios> <519372F1.6050902@r-finger.com> <5543572.N8ppyBn6lW@helios> <5193B925.6010607@r-finger.com> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.6.2-0ubuntu0.1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: proposal to move cogl, clutter and related recipes from oe-core to dedicated meta-clutter layer X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 May 2013 17:49:29 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I'd ask that we give trying to make this work from OE-Core a fair try. If in say 3 months from now OE-Core is causing clutter users pain we can look again at the problem. Equally, if nobody has sent me any clutter patches in the next three months, I wouldn't consider than a fair try. I'm happy enough to see the clutter recipes architecture changed to better support their users. If that means adding some of the machine specific tweaks to the core as examples I'm also ok with that rather than forcing those into BSP layers. I'm not saying we'll take every machine entry into the core but enough to show its usages would be acceptable in my view. I do agree with the view that we have enough mailing lists and so on and adding more is not appropriate where this is at right now. Cheers, Richard