From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dan.rpsys.net (dan.rpsys.net [93.97.175.187]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 660E160897 for ; Tue, 21 May 2013 12:14:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (dan.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-2.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id r4LCI33P019790; Tue, 21 May 2013 13:18:13 +0100 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at dan.rpsys.net Received: from dan.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (dan.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id P-qyVjJaGO_a; Tue, 21 May 2013 13:18:13 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.3.10] (rpvlan0 [192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-2.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id r4LCHvbV019766 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 21 May 2013 13:18:10 +0100 Message-ID: <1369124064.11013.13.camel@ted> From: Richard Purdie To: Tomas Frydrych In-Reply-To: <1369062325-30335-1-git-send-email-tf+lists.yocto@r-finger.com> References: <51969025.6040407@linux.intel.com> <1369062325-30335-1-git-send-email-tf+lists.yocto@r-finger.com> Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 09:14:24 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 3.6.4-0ubuntu1 Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: updates for cogl, clutter and mx X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 12:14:42 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Mon, 2013-05-20 at 16:05 +0100, Tomas Frydrych wrote: > > There are some issues with this patch set, some of the included patches > > either do not have Upstream-Status or Signed-off-by tags, please review > > that. > > Updated the various patch headers in v.2. > > > Also, I want to confirm that these are all new recipes and will not cause > > backward PRs (ie do you need PE bumps to these)? > > I renamed the mx recipe also to mx-1.0 for consistency, so yes, these are all > different packages now. > > > Finally, I think you need to update the packagegroup-core-clutter recipe. > > Done. Thanks for this. I'm not convinced with the delete everything, then re-add approach as it makes the git history even harder to read than git's normal rename handling which is bad enough. I therefore split the removal patch over the other patches. I also tweaked the patch titles as "New xxxx" doesn't read well when listed alongside the other changes. I've merged this with this minor tweaks. Cheers, Richard