From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dan.rpsys.net (dan.rpsys.net [93.97.175.187]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9382360655 for ; Tue, 21 May 2013 22:57:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (dan.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-2.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id r4LN0aI2011437; Wed, 22 May 2013 00:00:36 +0100 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at dan.rpsys.net Received: from dan.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (dan.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id ATZISBtX_RG8; Wed, 22 May 2013 00:00:36 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.3.10] (rpvlan0 [192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-2.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id r4LN0POX011428 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 22 May 2013 00:00:31 +0100 Message-ID: <1369177001.3843.9.camel@ted> From: Richard Purdie To: Gary Thomas Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 23:56:41 +0100 In-Reply-To: <519BB951.2040502@mlbassoc.com> References: <51962FFE.3040202@mlbassoc.com> <1369127448.11013.16.camel@ted> <519BB951.2040502@mlbassoc.com> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.6.4-0ubuntu1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Subject: Re: Poor first impression X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 22:57:04 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tue, 2013-05-21 at 12:13 -0600, Gary Thomas wrote: > On 2013-05-21 03:10, Richard Purdie wrote: > > On Fri, 2013-05-17 at 07:26 -0600, Gary Thomas wrote: > >> I just tried to run Poky/Yocto on a fresh Ubuntu 12.04 system. I knew there would > >> be missing bits and have seen the "sanity" messages in the past, so I thought I'd > >> just carry on. Today's experience was not pretty and would it not for my experience > >> with this, I would have been very perplexed... > > > > There are two issues there, firstly the scripts/bitbake binary is doing > > a really bad job, secondly, one of the improved debugging patches I > > added to bitbake, regressed things in this case. > > > > I posted a patch to bitbake last night, I've just posted a fix for > > scripts/bitbake now. These two together should improve this. I agree > > that particular error would create a poor first impression, thanks for > > reporting it. > > With this patch, no 'git' and a fresh build I still get this: > > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "/home/local/poky-multi/bitbake/bin/bitbake", line 293, in > ret = main() > File "/home/local/poky-multi/bitbake/bin/bitbake", line 260, in main > event = server.event_queue.get(block=False) > File "/usr/lib/python2.6/multiprocessing/queues.py", line 104, in get > raise Empty > Empty > Pseudo is not present but is required, building this first before the main build > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "/home/local/poky-multi/bitbake/bin/bitbake", line 293, in > ret = main() > File "/home/local/poky-multi/bitbake/bin/bitbake", line 260, in main > event = server.event_queue.get(block=False) > File "/usr/lib/python2.6/multiprocessing/queues.py", line 104, in get > raise Empty > Empty > ERROR: OE-core's config sanity checker detected a potential misconfiguration. > Either fix the cause of this error or at your own risk disable the checker (see sanity.conf). > Following is the list of potential problems / advisories: > > Please install the following missing utilities: git > > Still not very pretty. Did you apply both patches, the one for bitbake and the one for OE-Core? This looks like the bitbake one is missing. Cheers, Richard