From: Phil Blundell <pb@pbcl.net>
To: Paul Barker <paul@paulbarker.me.uk>
Cc: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org,
openembedded-core <openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: [oe] [RFC] Layers, PRINC and bbappends
Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 11:14:14 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1369217654.6695.62.camel@phil-desktop.brightsign> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANyK_8cbVGMQkD7_KEd5KYTBxP+ZT5jY6VVVpdSAv_uY7JPY1w@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, 2013-05-22 at 09:47 +0100, Paul Barker wrote:
> I've just sent a patch to the yocto@ list to fix this but it's brought
> up two things:
>
> 1) In openembedded-core/meta/classes/image.bbclass SPLASH is set with
> '?='. I'm overriding this with '=' in
> meta-raspberrypi/conf/machine/raspberrypi.conf which means it can't be
> overridden further in local.conf. Is this worth changing to '??=' in
> image.bbclass, '?=' in the machine conf so that it can be overridden
> with '=' in local.conf? Is my understanding of the overrides correct
> here?
You can always override it from local.conf using a _forcevariable
override (which used to be named "_local", in fact, but that terminology
turned out to be a bit confusing), or a _MACHINE override of course. So
I don't think there is any major problem here.
But, that said, it probably is true that the semantics of ??= are less
surprising for users (since it isn't position-dependent in the way
that ?= is) which might make it a better choice for image.bbclass.
p.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-22 10:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <40EC58CA-E878-4F77-8E39-4F8D86F48E29@dominion.thruhere.net>
2013-05-15 20:33 ` [oe] [RFC] Layers, PRINC and bbappends Richard Purdie
2013-05-15 23:02 ` Paul Barker
2013-05-22 8:47 ` Paul Barker
2013-05-22 9:17 ` Martin Jansa
2013-05-22 10:08 ` Paul Eggleton
2013-05-22 10:14 ` Phil Blundell [this message]
2013-05-23 2:50 ` Chris Larson
2013-05-27 12:07 ` Paul Barker
2013-05-16 6:23 ` Koen Kooi
2013-05-16 8:37 ` Paul Eggleton
2013-05-16 9:27 ` Martin Jansa
[not found] ` <1499979.6pTC18VfFV@helios>
2013-05-16 6:31 ` Koen Kooi
2013-05-16 8:29 ` Paul Eggleton
2013-05-16 8:59 ` Martin Jansa
2013-05-16 9:10 ` Paul Eggleton
2013-05-16 9:29 ` Martin Jansa
2013-05-16 20:15 ` Richard Purdie
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1369217654.6695.62.camel@phil-desktop.brightsign \
--to=pb@pbcl.net \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
--cc=openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org \
--cc=paul@paulbarker.me.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox