public inbox for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Mike Crowe <mac@mcrowe.com>
Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sstate.bbclass: binutils-cross is not a safe dependency
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2013 16:00:25 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1371135625.20823.59.camel@ted> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1371132404-27250-1-git-send-email-mac@mcrowe.com>

On Thu, 2013-06-13 at 15:06 +0100, Mike Crowe wrote:
> gcc always needs binutils in order to be useful. If binutils-cross is
> considered to be a safe dependency then gcc-cross can be reconstructed into
> the sysroot without binutils. Anyone who tries to use the compiler will end
> up using the system binutils which is either a bad thing (relying on system
> tools) or a very bad thing (it will be for the wrong architecture.)
> 
> In the absence of a better fix let's just stop binutils-cross being
> considered a safe dependency. The downside of this is that any
> reconstructing any other recipe that depends on binutils from the sstate
> cache will also cause binutils to be reconstructed.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mike Crowe <mac@mcrowe.com>
> ---
>  meta/classes/sstate.bbclass |    2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> I tried and failed to come up with a better fix for this problem. This
> fix at least means that everything will build using the correct
> version of binutils even if slightly more files are reconstructed from
> the sstate cache than would be desirable.

The correct fix for this is to whitelist the gcc depending on binutils
case but leave this "safe" version in place.

Cheers,

Richard


> 
> diff --git a/meta/classes/sstate.bbclass b/meta/classes/sstate.bbclass
> index 28dc312..0de62d8 100644
> --- a/meta/classes/sstate.bbclass
> +++ b/meta/classes/sstate.bbclass
> @@ -655,7 +655,7 @@ def setscene_depvalid(task, taskdependees, notneeded, d):
>      def isNativeCross(x):
>          return x.endswith("-native") or x.endswith("-cross") or x.endswith("-cross-initial")
>      def isSafeDep(x):
> -        if x in ["quilt-native", "autoconf-native", "automake-native", "gnu-config-native", "libtool-native", "pkgconfig-native", "gcc-cross", "binutils-cross", "gcc-cross-initial"]:
> +        if x in ["quilt-native", "autoconf-native", "automake-native", "gnu-config-native", "libtool-native", "pkgconfig-native", "gcc-cross", "gcc-cross-initial"]:
>              return True
>          return False
>      def isPostInstDep(x):




      reply	other threads:[~2013-06-13 15:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-05-20 12:22 [PATCH] kernel.bbclass: Add dependency on binutils Mike Crowe
2013-05-20 17:37 ` Khem Raj
2013-05-20 20:29   ` Mike Crowe
2013-05-20 22:25   ` Richard Purdie
2013-05-21  8:41     ` Mike Crowe
2013-06-13 14:06       ` [PATCH] sstate.bbclass: binutils-cross is not a safe dependency Mike Crowe
2013-06-13 15:00         ` Richard Purdie [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1371135625.20823.59.camel@ted \
    --to=richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=mac@mcrowe.com \
    --cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox