From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dan.rpsys.net (dan.rpsys.net [93.97.175.187]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5C646A901 for ; Thu, 20 Jun 2013 11:14:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (dan.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-2.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id r5KBKtwL001121; Thu, 20 Jun 2013 12:20:55 +0100 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at dan.rpsys.net Received: from dan.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (dan.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id l5dZqqueVYj0; Thu, 20 Jun 2013 12:20:55 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.3.10] (rpvlan0 [192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-2.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id r5KBKmHb001107 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 20 Jun 2013 12:20:50 +0100 Message-ID: <1371726864.20823.227.camel@ted> From: Richard Purdie To: "Burton, Ross" Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 12:14:24 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Evolution 3.6.4-0ubuntu1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] dbus: move libdbus-1.so* to base_libdir X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 11:14:49 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Thu, 2013-06-20 at 11:39 +0100, Burton, Ross wrote: > On 20 June 2013 11:36, wrote: > > From: Jackie Huang > > > > move libdbus-1.so* to base_libdir to kill a warning: > > > > WARNING: QA Issue: lib32-consolekit: /lib/security/ > > pam_ck_connector.so, installed in the base_prefix, > > requires a shared library under exec_prefix (/usr): > > libdbus-1.so.3 => /usr/lib/libdbus-1.so.3 (0xdead3000) > > > > Signed-off-by: Roy.Li > > Signed-off-by: Jackie Huang > > More and more and more libraries move. Do we *really* need to support > split-usr? Have you audited all of the udev helpers yet? I have to admit I'm not happy with the piece by piece approach this is taking. We're going to end up with nearly everything moving to base_libdir at this rate. If we're going to do this, I want someone to come up with a definitive list of what needs to move before any more of these merge. Cheers, Richard