From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from hetzner.pbcl.net (mail.pbcl.net [88.198.119.4]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 454E46B216 for ; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 14:33:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from cpc6-cmbg17-2-0-cust487.5-4.cable.virginmedia.com ([86.30.57.232] helo=[172.30.1.45]) by hetzner.pbcl.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Uz6K6-0007IM-ID; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 16:33:50 +0200 Message-ID: <1373985229.2651.84.camel@phil-desktop.brightsign> From: Phil Blundell To: Cristian Iorga Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 15:33:49 +0100 In-Reply-To: <1373984927-21039-1-git-send-email-cristian.iorga@intel.com> References: <1373984927-21039-1-git-send-email-cristian.iorga@intel.com> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.4.4-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 0/2] BlueZ 5 experimental recipes X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 14:33:51 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tue, 2013-07-16 at 17:28 +0300, Cristian Iorga wrote: > Observe my investigation below in order to decide if RREPLACES is needed. > Conclusion: BlueZ 5.x will be eventually an upgrade path for an already installed > embedded device. As such, RREPLACES is needed for a system-wide upgrade. It wasn't very obvious to me that these results make a compelling case for bluez4 needing to RREPLACE bluez5. Indeed, this section: root@qemux86:~# opkg install bluez5 Multiple replacers for bluez5, using first one (bluez4). Package bluez4 is already installed on root. root@qemux86:~# opkg list-installed | grep bluez bluez4 - 4.101-r6.0 libasound-module-bluez - 4.101-r6.0 ... seems to illustrate (modulo the usual amount of opkg craziness) why having it be so is not a very good thing. p.