From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from hetzner.pbcl.net (mail.pbcl.net [88.198.119.4]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11A7A6B485 for ; Tue, 30 Jul 2013 10:04:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from cpc6-cmbg17-2-0-cust487.5-4.cable.virginmedia.com ([86.30.57.232] helo=[172.30.1.45]) by hetzner.pbcl.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1V46ml-00046u-1e; Tue, 30 Jul 2013 12:04:07 +0200 Message-ID: <1375178646.13247.50.camel@phil-desktop.brightsign> From: Phil Blundell To: "Burton, Ross" , Saul Wold Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 11:04:06 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Evolution 3.4.4-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com, openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [CONSOLIDATED PULL (M3 rc1) 00/26] Needs early review and ACK X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 10:04:11 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tue, 2013-07-30 at 10:46 +0100, Burton, Ross wrote: > On 30 July 2013 07:14, Saul Wold wrote: > > Saul Wold (2): > > bluez5: Add obex as a PACKAGECONFIG and package seperately > > I'm still unsure why this patch was needed. I've nothing against > splitting out the OBEX functionality and controlling it with a > packageconfig, but this does disable it by default when before it was > enabled. Was that patch ever actually posted to the list? I don't recall seeing it in my inbox and I can't find it in the ML archive on the web. p.