From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dan.rpsys.net (dan.rpsys.net [93.97.175.187]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1EC36009A for ; Thu, 15 Aug 2013 16:24:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (dan.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-2.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id r7FGYjoY010711; Thu, 15 Aug 2013 17:35:26 +0100 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at dan.rpsys.net Received: from dan.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (dan.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 2cTsfhgvmXL3; Thu, 15 Aug 2013 17:35:25 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.3.10] (rpvlan0 [192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-2.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id r7FGZMJd010723 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 15 Aug 2013 17:35:24 +0100 Message-ID: <1376583837.22952.72.camel@ted> From: Richard Purdie To: Phil Blundell Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2013 17:23:57 +0100 In-Reply-To: <1376560519.17787.16.camel@phil-desktop.brightsign> References: <02e6f25c210b0628dc4ee4482474b0e6ce5606e4.1376379182.git.rongqing.li@windriver.com> <520A82BA.2070706@linux.intel.com> <520B1595.3060909@windriver.com> <20130814065609.GQ17945@jama> <1376477217.22952.5.camel@ted> <20130814105915.GU17945@jama> <520CA4AF.4040403@windriver.com> <1376560519.17787.16.camel@phil-desktop.brightsign> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.6.4-0ubuntu1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] sstate.bbclass: fix parallel building issue X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2013 16:24:13 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Thu, 2013-08-15 at 10:55 +0100, Phil Blundell wrote: > On Thu, 2013-08-15 at 17:51 +0800, Rongqing Li wrote: > > OK, But your issue is not related to me. > > > > I can reproduce my issue by two simple script. > > If tar is deciding that the file has "changed" just because the link > count on the dentry has increased, that sounds like it is probably a bug > in tar and ought to be fixed there. > > That said, I can't immediately think why autotools_copy_aclocal couldn't > use a symlink rather than a hard link which would avoid this whole > problem. If the file is in the sysroot then there should be no risk of > it going away underneath its user. Sadly this doesn't work. We block copy a set of .m4 files from the sysroot. We can be running do_configure of package A whilst package B is de-installed from the sysroot and this leads to files disappearing whilst they're being accessed. Its turned out to be a really awkward problem to fix. Cheers, Richard