From: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Mark Hatle <mark.hatle@windriver.com>
Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] sstate.bbclass: fix parallel building issue
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2013 00:04:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1376607841.22952.103.camel@ted> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <520D0174.7030901@windriver.com>
On Thu, 2013-08-15 at 11:27 -0500, Mark Hatle wrote:
> On 8/15/13 11:23 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
> > On Thu, 2013-08-15 at 10:55 +0100, Phil Blundell wrote:
> >> On Thu, 2013-08-15 at 17:51 +0800, Rongqing Li wrote:
> >>> OK, But your issue is not related to me.
> >>>
> >>> I can reproduce my issue by two simple script.
> >>
> >> If tar is deciding that the file has "changed" just because the link
> >> count on the dentry has increased, that sounds like it is probably a bug
> >> in tar and ought to be fixed there.
> >>
> >> That said, I can't immediately think why autotools_copy_aclocal couldn't
> >> use a symlink rather than a hard link which would avoid this whole
> >> problem. If the file is in the sysroot then there should be no risk of
> >> it going away underneath its user.
> >
> > Sadly this doesn't work. We block copy a set of .m4 files from the
> > sysroot. We can be running do_configure of package A whilst package B is
> > de-installed from the sysroot and this leads to files disappearing
> > whilst they're being accessed. Its turned out to be a really awkward
> > problem to fix.
>
> Do we need some kind of a read/write lock on accessing those files. (Is this
> even something that we can do easily though the existing mechanisms?)
It would kill performance for no good reason, been there, looked at
it...
Cheers,
Richard
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-15 23:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-13 8:20 [PATCH 0/1] sstate.bbclass: fix parallel building issue rongqing.li
2013-08-13 8:20 ` [PATCH 1/1] " rongqing.li
2013-08-13 19:02 ` Saul Wold
2013-08-14 5:28 ` Rongqing Li
2013-08-14 6:56 ` Martin Jansa
2013-08-14 9:27 ` Rongqing Li
2013-08-14 10:46 ` Richard Purdie
2013-08-14 10:59 ` Martin Jansa
2013-08-15 9:51 ` Rongqing Li
2013-08-15 9:55 ` Phil Blundell
2013-08-15 10:08 ` Rongqing Li
2013-08-15 16:23 ` Richard Purdie
2013-08-15 16:27 ` Mark Hatle
2013-08-15 23:04 ` Richard Purdie [this message]
2013-08-16 8:25 ` Rongqing Li
2013-08-16 9:05 ` Rongqing Li
2013-08-16 9:27 ` Richard Purdie
2013-08-15 16:38 ` Phil Blundell
2013-09-12 15:39 ` Richard Purdie
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1376607841.22952.103.camel@ted \
--to=richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=mark.hatle@windriver.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox