From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dan.rpsys.net (dan.rpsys.net [93.97.175.187]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCE116A95B for ; Tue, 27 Aug 2013 10:10:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (dan.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-2.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id r7RAMNHG010566; Tue, 27 Aug 2013 11:22:23 +0100 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at dan.rpsys.net Received: from dan.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (dan.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 7WbqgVkSo13K; Tue, 27 Aug 2013 11:22:23 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.3.10] (rpvlan0 [192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-2.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id r7RAMJm2010544 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 27 Aug 2013 11:22:21 +0100 Message-ID: <1377598192.32502.3.camel@ted> From: Richard Purdie To: Qi.Chen@windriver.com Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 11:09:52 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Evolution 3.6.4-0ubuntu1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] runqemu-internal: change the lock acquire/release logic X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 10:10:08 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tue, 2013-08-27 at 15:08 +0800, Qi.Chen@windriver.com wrote: > From: Chen Qi > > Checking whether the lock file exists is sufficient for runqemu. > The contents of the lock file is not important. What happens if the runqemu script crashes and leaves the lockfile around? Why are we removing perfectly functional code? Cheers, Richard