From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga09.intel.com (mga09.intel.com [134.134.136.24]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A3B66A5AE for ; Thu, 5 Sep 2013 13:04:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fmsmga001.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.23]) by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 05 Sep 2013 06:01:26 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.90,847,1371106800"; d="scan'208";a="391471121" Received: from unknown (HELO [10.255.14.130]) ([10.255.14.130]) by fmsmga001.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 05 Sep 2013 06:04:22 -0700 Message-ID: <1378386260.13564.8.camel@empanada> From: Tom Zanussi To: "Burton, Ross" Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2013 08:04:20 -0500 In-Reply-To: References: <4562a00806c5a6573b5aa650764ad12bc93edda7.1378339881.git.dvhart@linux.intel.com> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.4.1 (3.4.1-2.fc17) Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: "Saxena, Rahul" , Darren Hart , OE-core , "Seow, Chen Yong" , Poky Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] xf86-video-mga: Pull in Matrox MGA support from meta-intel X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2013 13:04:21 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Thu, 2013-09-05 at 10:57 +0100, Burton, Ross wrote: > On 5 September 2013 01:18, Darren Hart wrote: > > In support of the more generic x86 BSPs, pull in the Matrox driver > > recipe from meta-intel. > > What machine is this for in particular? In discussion with Nitin > about MGA a few weeks back the conclusion was that the vesa driver > should be sufficient. As far as I'm aware the reference platforms > don't ship with MGA hardware so it's up to the owner of the platform > to install whatever they have to hand (mga, nvidia, ATI, etc), or am I > wrong about that? > It's my understanding that some of these server-type systems like Romley and Crystal Forest have on-chip graphics disabled and ship with ancient MGA graphics, which apparently we have a cheap source of chips for... Probably vesa would work for these systems, cc'ing those in the know... Tom > > Remove the checkfile patch from Ross as this is now handled adequately > > with the configure prepend hack which assumes success for any checkfile > > calls. > > Assuming success in an distro where opengl isn't enabled will result > in the driver believing that DRI is enabled when it isn't, so expect > to see build failures from this. > > Ross