From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dan.rpsys.net (dan.rpsys.net [93.97.175.187]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 135BF6BD5E for ; Mon, 9 Sep 2013 15:24:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (dan.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-2.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id r89Fc7JK012401; Mon, 9 Sep 2013 16:38:07 +0100 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at dan.rpsys.net Received: from dan.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (dan.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id Kug7HnoJq_X4; Mon, 9 Sep 2013 16:38:07 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.3.10] (rpvlan0 [192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-2.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id r89Fc1ZQ012386 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 9 Sep 2013 16:38:03 +0100 Message-ID: <1378740263.3484.122.camel@ted> From: Richard Purdie To: Denys Dmytriyenko Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2013 16:24:23 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20130909135125.GD5834@denix.org> References: <20130906185741.GA5834@denix.org> <20130909135125.GD5834@denix.org> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.6.4-0ubuntu1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: eglibc_2.17.bb: Failure expanding variable SELECTED_OPTIMIZATION[:=] X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2013 15:24:42 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Mon, 2013-09-09 at 09:51 -0400, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: > Any ideas or suggestions at this point would be greatly appreciated! Thanks. I have vague recollections about this from something happening in master. Perhaps try with: http://git.openembedded.org/bitbake/commit/?id=4d50690489ee8dc329a9b0c7bc4ceb29b71e95e9 applied. This might things more deterministic, perhaps always breaking or perhaps never. Have you got two definitions of the "get_optimization" function? Cheers, Richard