Re: OE gcc-cross with builtin sysroot, BUG?

[Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>]

On Wed, 2013-09-11 at 15:01 +0200, Nicolas Dechesne wrote:
> 
> On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 2:00 PM, Richard Purdie
> <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:

>         Not really, its actually intentionally designed like this
>         since its
>         pointless rebuilding gcc-cross multiple time just because we
>         want to use
>         it with a different sysroot. We therefore just pass in the
>         arguments to
>         the compiler to ensure it uses the right one. If you remove
>         them, you
>         hit the problems you describe.
>         
>         We should probably compile in a bogus sysroot so it never
>         works and
>         makes this kind of issue more visible.
> 
> hmm. ok. i see. it would certainly help to have a better 'error'
> message... i suppose that not having a builtin sysroot at all, would
> be an even bigger problem as it would default to /usr/include... 
> 
> 
Right, that would be even worse than a poisoned one...

Cheers,

Richard
>