From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dan.rpsys.net (dan.rpsys.net [93.97.175.187]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1712E6BD79 for ; Fri, 20 Sep 2013 16:28:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (dan.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-2.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id r8KGgRDk028899; Fri, 20 Sep 2013 17:42:27 +0100 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at dan.rpsys.net Received: from dan.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (dan.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id yBMsz1nTfmgx; Fri, 20 Sep 2013 17:42:26 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.3.10] (rpvlan0 [192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-2.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id r8KGgNvY028894 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 20 Sep 2013 17:42:25 +0100 Message-ID: <1379694466.18603.154.camel@ted> From: Richard Purdie To: Colin Walters Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2013 17:27:46 +0100 In-Reply-To: <1379693965.1665.13.camel@localhost> References: <1379688225-29241-1-git-send-email-paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com> <1379693055.1665.9.camel@localhost> <4037078.8vkzREKUPL@helios> <1379693965.1665.13.camel@localhost> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.6.4-0ubuntu1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: Paul Eggleton , openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] glib-2.0: fix broken python script header on machines using buildtools X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2013 16:28:07 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Fri, 2013-09-20 at 12:19 -0400, Colin Walters wrote: > On Fri, 2013-09-20 at 17:14 +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote: > > Hi Colin, > > > > On Friday 20 September 2013 12:04:15 Colin Walters wrote: > > > On Fri, 2013-09-20 at 15:43 +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote: > > > > it also seems sensible to do > > > > this for native as well instead of explicitly trying to exclude that > > > > case. > > > > > > But someone presumably introduced the explicit special case for native > > > for a reason, I'd expect some blame analysis to be done here to > > > determine whether those reasons were bogus or not. > > > > I already did that as a matter of course; there is no clue in the message > > for the commit that added it: > > > > http://cgit.openembedded.org/openembedded-core/commit/?id=08fd9740b9359425ec6ee9810fab1152e9737b0c > > Ok, well then I'd expect something in your commit message similar to > "There was no original rationale for why native was special cased, and I > think it should be safe to remove." > > It might be still cached in Richard's brain of course...let's see =) That particular expression would have at best been a null operation for the -native case. Its around release time so I probably fixed the thing that was broken, no more, no less. I'm fine with replacing it with something better. Cheers, Richard