From: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
To: "David Nyström" <david.c.nystrom@gmail.com>
Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] shadow: Create recipe nativesdk-shadow
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2013 11:03:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1380103400.18603.318.camel@ted> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5241A215.4020501@gmail.com>
On Tue, 2013-09-24 at 16:30 +0200, David Nyström wrote:
> I'm have a question about this though.
>
> diff --git a/meta/recipes-extended/shadow/shadow.inc
> b/meta/recipes-extended/shadow/shadow.inc
> index 4df5e5e..75b0afc 100644
> --- a/meta/recipes-extended/shadow/shadow.inc
> +++ b/meta/recipes-extended/shadow/shadow.inc
> <snip>
> +pkg_postinst_${PN} () {
> + if [ "x$D" != "x" ]; then
> + rootarg="--root=$D"
> + else
> + rootarg=""
> + fi
> +
> + pwconv $rootarg
> + grpconv $rootarg
> +}
> <snip>
>
> This will introduce the postinstall hook for both ${BPN}-native and
> ${BPN} ?. Before the change, the postinstall hook was activated only by
> ${BPN} afaict. Tried removing it from native* through
> pkg_postinst_${BPN}, but that does not seem to work.
Basically the postinst is ignored for the -native version. It never gets
packaged so isn't relevant. Adding in special cases for native for each
and every recipe would get ugly very quickly.
> Hmm, slightly off-topic, but when looking at the postinstalls:
>
> shadow:
> cat /tmp/opkg-extract-574/CONTROL/postinst
> if [ "x$D" != "x" ]; then
> rootarg="--root=$D"
> else
> rootarg=""
> fi
>
> pwconv $rootarg
> grpconv $rootarg
> update-alternatives --install /usr/bin/passwd passwd
> /usr/bin/passwd.shadow 200
> update-alternatives --install /usr/bin/chfn chfn /usr/bin/chfn.shadow 200
> update-alternatives --install /usr/bin/newgrp newgrp
> /usr/bin/newgrp.shadow 200
>
> Above is not a problem since OPKG_OFFLINE_ROOT in update-alternatives
> can be used to redirect symlink creation when creating a from a package
> repo.
>
> nativesdk-shadow:
> if [ "x$D" != "x" ]; then
> rootarg="--root=$D"
> else
> rootarg=""
> fi
>
> pwconv $rootarg
> grpconv $rootarg
> update-alternatives --install
> /opt/poky/1.4+snapshot/sysroots/x86_64-pokysdk-linux/usr/bin/passwd
> passwd
> /opt/poky/1.4+snapshot/sysroots/x86_64-pokysdk-linux/usr/bin/passwd.shadow
> 200
> update-alternatives --install
> /opt/poky/1.4+snapshot/sysroots/x86_64-pokysdk-linux/usr/bin/chfn chfn
> /opt/poky/1.4+snapshot/sysroots/x86_64-pokysdk-linux/usr/bin/chfn.shadow 200
> update-alternatives --install
> /opt/poky/1.4+snapshot/sysroots/x86_64-pokysdk-linux/usr/bin/newgrp
> newgrp
> /opt/poky/1.4+snapshot/sysroots/x86_64-pokysdk-linux/usr/bin/newgrp.shadow
> 200
> update-alternatives --install
> /opt/poky/1.4+snapshot/sysroots/x86_64-pokysdk-linux/usr/bin/chsh chsh
> /opt/poky/1.4+snapshot/sysroots/x86_64-pokysdk-linux/usr/bin/chsh.shadow 200
>
> Could we not add a "--root" option to update-alternatives like done to
> update-rc.d instead of hardcoding paths or using envs.
nativesdk are built to run in that specific path. We're therefore not
installing them to some subdirectory where a root makes sense, the
prefix really was /opt/xxx. We then manipulate things later to make them
more relocatable.
>
> Also, seems like ${sysconfdir} in the nativesdk-opkg postinstall expands to:
>
> chmod 0755 $D${sysconfdir}/rcS.d/S${POSTINSTALL_INITPOSITION}run-postinsts
> chmod 0755
> $D/opt/poky/1.4+snapshot/sysroots/x86_64-pokysdk-linux/etc/rcS.d/S98run-postinsts
>
> Is this really expected behaviour ?
nativesdk postinstalls are probably badly handled at the moment. I
suspect if things can run at rootfs creation time they work out, if they
can't run then, they never happen at all. We don't have a "first boot"
of the sdk...
Cheers,
Richard
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-25 10:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-23 16:33 [PATCHv3] makedevs: add nativesdk to BBCLASSEXTENDS David Nyström
2013-09-23 16:34 ` [PATCH] shadow: Create recipe nativesdk-shadow David Nyström
2013-09-23 18:01 ` Mark Hatle
2013-09-23 19:01 ` David Nystrom
2013-09-23 21:14 ` Richard Purdie
2013-09-24 8:25 ` Richard Purdie
2013-09-24 14:30 ` David Nyström
2013-09-25 10:03 ` Richard Purdie [this message]
2013-09-25 12:24 ` David Nyström
2013-09-23 16:34 ` [PATCHv2] libpam: Avoid host contamination issue w. libprelude David Nyström
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1380103400.18603.318.camel@ted \
--to=richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=david.c.nystrom@gmail.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox