From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Received: from dan.rpsys.net (dan.rpsys.net [93.97.175.187])
	by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D4D76B238
	for <openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>;
	Mon,  4 Nov 2013 12:10:20 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (dan.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1])
	by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-2.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id
	rA4C9H5j010054; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 12:10:09 GMT
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at dan.rpsys.net
Received: from dan.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (dan.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with LMTP id ZG-SMuEEZv0v; Mon,  4 Nov 2013 12:10:09 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from [192.168.3.10] (rpvlan0 [192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0)
	by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-2.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id
	rA4CA58g010187
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256
	verify=NOT); Mon, 4 Nov 2013 12:10:06 GMT
Message-ID: <1383567000.6271.109.camel@ted>
From: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Otavio Salvador <otavio@ossystems.com.br>
Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2013 12:10:00 +0000
In-Reply-To: <CAP9ODKqr8eHVck5YSpVCgxugW7UJZrXfNey=sM=_6Eo-W1HPDg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <cover.1383558655.git.hongxu.jia@windriver.com>
	<1383565168.6271.107.camel@ted>
	<CAP9ODKqr8eHVck5YSpVCgxugW7UJZrXfNey=sM=_6Eo-W1HPDg@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.6.4-0ubuntu1 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
	<openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>, Saul Wold <saul.wold@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 0/5] fix WARNING: QA Issue on kmod/udev/nfs-utils (unsafe references [/ references to /usr/lib])
X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
	<openembedded-core.lists.openembedded.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/options/openembedded-core>,
	<mailto:openembedded-core-request@lists.openembedded.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/>
List-Post: <mailto:openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openembedded-core-request@lists.openembedded.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core>,
	<mailto:openembedded-core-request@lists.openembedded.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2013 12:10:21 -0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Mon, 2013-11-04 at 09:48 -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 9:39 AM, Richard Purdie
> <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > On Mon, 2013-11-04 at 17:56 +0800, Hongxu Jia wrote:
> >> Change in V2: The fourth patch fixed the QA Issue on udev, it was missed on previous version.
> >>
> >> //Hongxu
> >>
> >> The following changes since commit f3541226b8b1187e79dec0f6f9f3c58cedf9ac9b:
> >>
> >>   bitbake: hob: do not display the "Package list may be incomplete!" dialog (2013-11-01 17:59:31 +0000)
> >>
> >> are available in the git repository at:
> >>
> >>   git://git.pokylinux.org/poky-contrib hongxu/fix-qa-issue
> >>   http://git.pokylinux.org/cgit.cgi/poky-contrib/log/?h=hongxu/fix-qa-issue
> >>
> >> Hongxu Jia (5):
> >>   insane.bbclass: support to skip  unsafe references in binaries qa
> >>     check.
> >>   kmod: fix QA issue
> >>   udev: fix  QA issue
> >>   udev: fix QA issue
> >>   nfs-utils: fix QA issue
> >
> > Last time these warnings came up I asked for a clear plan about what
> > needed to live in / and what needed to live in /usr and how we were
> > going to fix things once and for all (or forget this idea).
> >
> > Where is the plan? Why is it ok to just ignore these particular
> > warnings?
> 
> I don't think supporting /bin and /sbin separated than /usr is worth the work.

I keep hearing that some people do need this. I'm not against it in
principle, equally I do want to see a plan and/or complete patchset
before we take more patches for it.

Cheers,

Richard