Re: [PATCH V4] expect: Add recipe

[Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>]

On Wed, 2013-11-06 at 10:58 -0800, Khem Raj wrote:On Wednesday, November
6, 2013, Saul Wold wrote:
>         On 11/05/2013 08:58 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
>                 
>                 On Nov 5, 2013, at 8:35 PM, Saul Wold
>                 <sgw@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>                 
>                         On 11/04/2013 07:41 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
>                                 From: Mihaela Sendrea
>                                 <mihaela.sendrea@enea.com>
>                                 
>                                 Nedeed for gcc-runtime tests.
>                                 
>                         
>                         i am seeing configure fails with this patch
>                         
>                                 configure:2350: checking for correct
>                                 TEA configuration
>                                 configure:2363: result: ok (TEA 3.9)
>                                 configure:2430: configuring expect
>                                 5.45
>                                 configure:2508: checking for Tcl
>                                 configuration
>                                 configure:2528:
>                                 error: /srv/ssd/sgw/builds/world/tmp/sysroots/genericx86/usr/lib directory doesn't contain tclConfig.sh
>                 
>                 
>                 OK what happens if you readd DEPENDS += “tcl” ?
>                 since you have it reproduced may be its best to try it
>                 out.
>                 
>         
>         yup, DEPENDS does the trick, so there might be some issue
>         someplace else.
>         
> 
> 
> thx i will send an update v5 but i wonder why RDEPENDS didnt turn into
> a depends may be bitbake issue

I take back what I said earlier, RDEPENDS do not automatically become
DEPENDS. Bitbake does translate them into DEPENDS namespace internally
and that are applied for the packaging tasks but the behaviour is
correct and you need both. Sorry for the confusion.

Cheers,

Richard