From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mga03.intel.com ([143.182.124.21]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Szl3W-000488-8j for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Fri, 10 Aug 2012 10:58:54 +0200 Received: from azsmga002.ch.intel.com ([10.2.17.35]) by azsmga101.ch.intel.com with ESMTP; 10 Aug 2012 01:47:03 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.77,744,1336374000"; d="scan'208";a="132466326" Received: from unknown (HELO helios.localnet) ([10.252.121.78]) by AZSMGA002.ch.intel.com with ESMTP; 10 Aug 2012 01:47:02 -0700 From: Paul Eggleton To: Koen Kooi Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 09:47:01 +0100 Message-ID: <1384904.B8yRp5DXBX@helios> Organization: Intel Corporation User-Agent: KMail/4.9 (Linux/3.2.0-27-generic-pae; KDE/4.9.0; i686; ; ) In-Reply-To: <9145620D-0D9C-4269-9ED4-B0E2E81086E3@dominion.thruhere.net> References: <1344475516-27640-1-git-send-email-raj.khem@gmail.com> <9145620D-0D9C-4269-9ED4-B0E2E81086E3@dominion.thruhere.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/12] gcc: Switch SRC_URI to use svn X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 08:58:54 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" On Friday 10 August 2012 10:03:06 Koen Kooi wrote: > Op 9 aug. 2012, om 03:25 heeft Khem Raj het volgende geschreven: > > svn tar balls are 96M as compared to 1.3G git tars > > its unnessary to suck in that much of data. > > That's indeed a big difference and also expected, with svn you only get > revision N and N-1, with git you get everything. But even so, I can fetch > that 1.3GB a *lot* faster than that 0.1GB svn. Maybe I'm on the wrong side > of the ocean, but that gcc svn server is sloooooooooooooooooooooow. FWIW the git option was much, much, much slower for us here in the UK. Cheers, Paul -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre