From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mga03.intel.com ([143.182.124.21]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1StbT2-0003uK-Oa for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 24 Jul 2012 11:31:49 +0200 Received: from azsmga001.ch.intel.com ([10.2.17.19]) by azsmga101.ch.intel.com with ESMTP; 24 Jul 2012 02:20:20 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.71,315,1320652800"; d="scan'208";a="172420481" Received: from unknown (HELO helios.localnet) ([10.252.121.60]) by azsmga001.ch.intel.com with ESMTP; 24 Jul 2012 02:20:19 -0700 From: Paul Eggleton To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2012 10:20:18 +0100 Message-ID: <1386136.0joZJkJK2h@helios> Organization: Intel Corporation User-Agent: KMail/4.8.4 (Linux/3.2.0-26-generic-pae; KDE/4.8.4; i686; ; ) In-Reply-To: <1610928.T7hSJDQ7P6@helios> References: <1610928.T7hSJDQ7P6@helios> MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: more pedantry: inconsistent presentation of how to introduce layers X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2012 09:31:49 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" On Tuesday 24 July 2012 10:15:32 Paul Eggleton wrote: > > but every single meta-openembedded sub-layer uses the *other* form: > > > > BBPATH .= ":${LAYERDIR}" > > Again, only as of quite recently Actually it seems that may not be true. This change was made in May 2011. Cheers, Paul -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre